One Thing You Should Never Tell Your Aging Investors

Dec 30, 2020 | aging, aging in place, aging investor, cost of aging, cost of long term care, elder investor, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, handling money for seniors, investor, long term care, medicare, retirement planning, senior investor, seniors finances

In retirement planning discussions, we see this statement financial professionals often publish for their clients:

“The average lifetime out of pocket costs for healthcare for a 65 year old couple retiring today is $285,000.”

Why should you never say this? It’s misleading at best and at worst, it’s false. From my own research as to where the number came from, I found it in government sources calculating Medicare deductibles and supplemental insurance payments, and co-pays Medicare does not cover. Generally, the out of pocket calculation refers to non-covered “medical” costs. But when that term gets diluted to mean “healthcare” it is far too broad and it simply ignores the reality that long term care is indeed healthcare. Medicare does not cover that at all, except for limited stays in skilled nursing homes following hospitalizations. It is noteworthy that when the Federal government uses data to calculate what out of pocket medical costs will be, the subject of long term care is entirely omitted.

The “average” lifetime cost of long-term care for two people in this country is far greater than $285,000. According to research by long term care insurance provider, Genworth, seven in ten people will need long term care at some point in their lives.

The comprehensive Genworth cost of care study, done annually, was published for 2020. Consider that at some point, with longevity being as it is, an older person with multiple medical conditions may need 24/7 care. Almost everyone will tell the advisor that he or she wants to stay at home and age in place. What will that cost at home in any of the most expensive states? In California, for example, the median cost of in-home care with a non-licensed caregiver full time, 27/7 is $252,000 per year! This is not medical care, in the sense that no skilled nursing is part of it, no doctor’s prescription is involved, and the agencies that supply unlicensed home care workers can charge whatever the market will bear.

A truthful financial professional will never mislead aging clients, or those planning for retirement by telling them that all they have to worry about for their future out of pocket healthcare costs is $285,000. Prudent financial advisors will themselves look annually at the Genworth study and help clients calculate the costs of long-term care, which every person should know about.

Costs of care, whether at home, in an adult day health center, in assisted living or in a skilled nursing facility vary widely from state to state. Looking at national median costs can be of little benefit to anyone doing retirement planning. Instead, using data from the Genworth study, one can look state by state for the real, most applicable numbers derived from where your client lives or plans to retire.

From my perspective, financial advisors are not educated to fully understand the difference between government provided statistics about out of pocket, non-Medicare covered medical costs and what we mean by long term care. They are quite different terms. It is distressing to me, with substantial experience in nursing, to see the fallacy of statements published by financial professionals about what retirement planning should include. Clients will be shocked to find that their own experience with having to pay for long term care out of pocket is not what their own advisor told them years before.

If you are in the retirement planning business and you want to serve your clients well, bear in mind that the data telling us that seven in ten people will need long term care at some point is likely true. Don’t fool yourself into thinking that retirement planning is just fine if a couple puts away enough to generate $285,000 for out of pocket medical costs. They also need to plan for how to pay for long term care, which they are statistically likely to need. That cost can destroy the most carefully laid plans for retirement income.

As a real-life example, take a client of ours, “George” at AgingParents.com, where we offer advice and guidance to families with aging loved ones. The advice encompasses legal, financial and healthcare issues as well as diminished capacity issues. George is 98 years of age and still sharp, though with some memory loss problems. He was wealthy at one point, after two successful careers. He owns his own home and wants to stay there for the rest of his days. His physical health is fragile and he now needs 24/7 help. He hired a good agency to provide in-home care. He spends in excess of $300,000 a year for caregiving alone, not counting the cost of everything else involved in home ownership, food, recreation, and out of pocket medical costs. Those medical costs involve dental surgery and equipment he needs at home. He has less than $400,000 left in savings. What if he lives another two to four years?

As you can see from this example, George is not a rare case. Many people do live into their 90s and beyond. Many start out with financial security, only to see assets rapidly depleted as the cost of care escalates to heights no one wanted to think about in retirement planning.

The Takeway

If you pride yourself in doing great retirement planning with clients, get real. Sit down with the data and find out what your clients might expect to need if they live long and require help at home or elsewhere. Tell the truth about it. If they need long-term care insurance to feel secure, talk about it. If they have sufficient assets to make it to 100 or so with full time care, they don’t need to get long term care insurance but they will need to have access to sufficient cash to cover the actual, not fantasy, costs. Above all, be clear in your own mind about what “out of pocket medical costs” means as compared with long term care costs. You are the key to these honest calculations. You can be the hero of the retirement planning story when you present an honest picture to every client you have.

By Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney, AgingInvestor.com

About Carolyn Rosenblatt and Dr. Mikol Davis

Carolyn Rosenblatt and Dr. Mikol Davis are co-authors of The Family Guide to Aging Parents (www.agingparents.com) and Succeed With Senior Clients: A Financial Advisors Guide To Best Practices and Hidden Truths About Retirement and Long Term Care. Rosenblatt, a registered nurse and elder law attorney, has more than 45 years combined experience in her professions. She has been quoted in the New York Times and, Wall Street Journal, Money magazine and many other publications. Davis, a clinical psychologist and gerontologist, has more than 44 years experience as a mental health provider. In addition to serving his patients, Davis creates online courses and products to assist professionals and the public with understanding aging issues. Rosenblatt and Davis have been married for 36 years.

How to Resolve Family Conflicts Care, Control and Money: Approaches from Legal, Psychological and Compassionate Perspectives

Dec 8, 2020 | aging, aging in place, cost of aging, cost of long term care, financial advisors, handling money for aging parents, long term care, retirement, retirement planning

Few things are more stressful than family disagreements, especially related to helping an aging family member. You’re invited to a VIP Virtual Event: How to Resolve Family Conflicts, Care, Control and Money Approaches from Legal, Psychological and Compassionate Perspectives

Wednesday, December 9 I 4:00 – 5:00 pm Pacific Standard Time

Featuring special guest speakers Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney and Dr. Mikol Davis, Psychologist of AgingParents.com

RSVP david@eleganceatnovato.com (Link will be provided with RSVP)

The first 20 attendees to RSVP will receive “The Family Guide to Aging Parents: Answers to Your Legal, Financial and Healthcare Questions,” by Carolyn L. Rosenblatt.

Five Very Personal Questions Older Advisors Need To Ask Themselves

Feb 5, 2020 | business transitions, financial advisors, financial judgement, handling money for seniors, investor, legacy planning, retirement, retirement planning, senior investor, seniors finances, wealth transfer

Advisors talk to clients all the time about the big topic of retirement. The industry inundates the media with advertising among competitors about who can do retirement planning best. You help clients plan for how to reach their goals. You do your research and calculations. You offer sage advice after years of experience. And then there’s your OWN plan: when is it time to schedule your own exit from the burdens of your work?

We often hear “age is only a number” or “age is just a state of mind”. That’s not really true. Age is a process that takes its toll and ignoring it can be costly. We work, we have our self-image of productivity and success. We pass 50, then 60 still going strong. But one day, you forget an important phone number you should know. You quietly ignore it. Until it happens again. You forget names and that’s not really such a big deal, as lots of your age-mate friends laugh about the same thing. But at the back of your mind there is that tiny, creeping doubt: am I starting to “lose it”?? Fear has emerged in the shadows of your consciousness. “How long can I keep going?”

The literature of the financial services industry is replete with advice about advisors’ succession planning. Sounds good, but it never tells you exactly when to move on, to merge your business with one managed by younger folks, or sell the book of business to someone you trust.

Here at AgingInvestor.com, we offer a deep dive into information about aging clients and how to spot signs of trouble. We give you our professional guidance as aging experts on how to understand when your client is demonstrating dangerous signs of diminished capacity. We give you concrete suggestions about what you need to do. We spend a little time on the subject of the impaired advisor too, and how firms can deal with that. But we have not asked you to look within and formulate a plan for your own exit strategy when you, yourself see any warning signs that age is affecting you in your work.

It’s time to do just that. We know that many advisors are still doing fine at 60, 65, 70 and up. However, age statistics don’t lie and loss of sharpness can happen to anyone. Advisors don’t age differently from anyone else in the world. A few firms do have a mandatory retirement age but most don’t. Independent advisors are independent for a good reason. You didn’t want to march to the beat of an institutional drum. That independence has likely led to greater job satisfaction and perhaps even greater financial success. But it leaves you vulnerable when you are on your own, getting on in years and not clear about whether to merge with a firm, sell, or otherwise set a date for realizing your own exit strategy.

Here are five things to ask yourself in considering the question: when is it the right time for me to exit this business?

Am I noticing any changes in my memory such as forgetting appointments or important phone numbers I ought to remember easily?
Am I having any difficulty concentrating on complex financial information that is part of the nuts and bolts of my work?
Has anyone in my life encouraged me to retire, “take it easy” or otherwise modify my work life?
Have I failed to create an exit plan for myself the way I help my clients set their retirement dates?
Am I afraid that if I retire, merge my business or sell my book that I will lose a sense of my own self-worth or identity?

If the answer to the first two questions is “yes”, that’s a signal to attend to rather than ignore. It may be time to quit while you’re ahead. If you have not thought these things through, that’s what needs to happen. As for the last questions, 4 and 5, consider this. Anyone who gives up a long-held identity based on what you do for a living has to face the same challenges. And many people do transition successfully to a different lifestyle, to finding purpose in other pursuits or in removing a major source of stress that can come from your work. The life cycle does not go on forever, despite society’s denial of aging. Kicking the bucket at your desk is not a pretty picture. On the contrary, you can set your glide path out in a graceful way.

The Takeaways:

If you are 65 or above, you really do need an exit strategy. It could take some years to execute it but have a plan. If you do not have one, create one. If you have any small, back-of-your-mind doubt about being as sharp as you once were in a younger day, pay attention to that little doubt. It just might be your internal nudge to make your exit happen. Consider a strategy that allows this at a time when you can make the most of the benefits involved while you’re still at the top of your game. What you have created has value. Take advantage of negotiating with that value at its high point.

Carolyn L Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney, AgingInvestor.com

What Extraordinary Advisors Do For Retiring Clients That Other Advisors Miss

Jan 4, 2020 | aging investor, elder investor, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, handling money for seniors, investor, retirement, retirement planning, senior investor, seniors finances

Every advisor wants clients to think that he or she is unique, different, better than the competition. Maybe you are. But if your retirement planning with them stops at calculating their planned retirement income and preserving their assets, you’re not extraordinary. It takes more than that to be outstanding.

Standing out among the others means that you are looking at the client’s entire life and relationship to their family members. Acquiring the courage and skill to do that is how you distinguish yourself from the next advisor down the street or anywhere. So how do you do that? Aren’t you just supposed to do a good job managing the money?

Advising about and managing the money is your essential bedrock, and then there is service above and beyond. That’s the unique play, going beyond average. It’s not so hard to do, but it may be outside your usual comfort zone. You assess. You discuss difficult subjects clients may not want to talk about. You take the time. You communicate more often than the next guy or gal. You offer tools. You become a sort of coach, encouraging a retiree or soon-to-be-retired client to do things that will make life easier for everyone around them. Your guidance can help not only your client, but every person whose life is touched by what your client does and fails to do. Most will likely think how wonderfully unusual you are for doing this. The average advisor won’t bother with any of it but not being ordinary, you can shine.

Let’s start with one tool you can use, created at AgingInvestor.com (free download here). In this article, we address the first item on our Ten Step Checklist For Smart Retirees. The first step is:

“Decide whom you want to communicate with about your future. Set a date and sit down together.”

This sounds simple but it’s not. Clients’ families frequently have poor communication about aging, the potential for needing help, and finances. The elders may want secrecy. Everyone may be afraid to talk about end of life. Although wealthier folks usually do better with estate planning than the less wealthy, not everyone takes the time to update their legal documents and your client’s loved ones need to know this. If you, the advisor encourage a family meeting (or friends meeting if there is no family) specifically about basic topics in your client’s future, that can get the ball rolling on communication about other essential matters related to getting older. The communication must address the real risk of becoming impaired with aging. The checklist is a guide for your client, a place to start. If a client does these steps, it will save everyone enormous and avoidable aggravation later.

Our checklist has ten steps in it. We’ll go through all the ten steps and why they are crucial in subsequent posts. Get your copy today and consider having a conversation with every client age 55 and older in your book about the checklist. You hand it out to them and discuss how to use it. You can bring it up at portfolio review, on the client’s birthday or at the time of retirement. If you want to set yourself apart, talking about things besides the client’s income in retirement will indeed set you apart.

By Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney, AgingInvestor.com

Does The Advisor Have A Role With Aging Clients Who Become Unsafe Living Alone?

Jul 11, 2019 | aging, aging in place, cost of aging, diminished cognition, elderly, health, resources for senior, resources for seniors, retirement planning

Does The Advisor Have A Role With Aging Clients Who Become Unsafe Living Alone?

Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Elder law attorney, AgingParents.com

You’ve known the client for many years. As time passes and she lives longer than she thought she would, you see her inevitable decline. She loses her husband, on whom she depended. She doesn’t want to move to assisted living or anywhere, even if you think it would be best for her. Her vision is dimming and her hearing isn’t good either. She has refused all help even when you reassured her she could easily afford whatever she needs.

Is there anything you can do? You care about the client but you’re used to just managing the money, and it isn’t clear that you are obligated to go beyond that. But you know that your client just isn’t safe alone anymore.

In these situations, the most competent advisors and wealth managers can feel conflicted about their roles. They have over the years come to know the client well and there is a sense of wanting the client to be safe. At the same time, maybe it’s not an advisor’s problem. What about the family? What if there is no family?

The first thing every advisor should do is what the regulators make optional for you: “try” to get a trusted third party contact. From our vantage point at AgingInvestor.com and AgingParents.com, we think it’s ridiculous to consider it an option rather than a requirement to get a trusted contact on file. The advisor can be more trusted than family in some cases and has a unique vantage point. YOU are the one who may be first to see your client’s decline and need for greater safety in the client’s living situation. You need to have someone to call. If it’s family and they are willing to step in, good. If there is no family, the client must be advised to hire a licensed person who is capable of overseeing their care if needed and to assist with day-to-day finances. The term “fiduciary” has a different meaning in the context of your industry, but outside it, a fiduciary can be a person whom the state licenses to manage money for someone who is not able to do it alone. They serve in the capacity similar to that of a conservator, guardian or power of attorney appointee, but the aging person still maintains some control as long as he or she remains cognitively intact. For those with no family a licensed fiduciary can solve the question: who can the client count on to help?

Even when there is family the aging client can still resist moving to a senior’s apartment in a community rather than struggling on living alone. It happened in our own family. It took two years for Dr. Davis’ mother, Alice to make up her mind to give up living alone in a house. To see a short video, Alice’s perspective of her decision. Click HERE.

At age 90, she had vision and hearing problems, arthritis, leg pain, unstable blood pressure, kidney and bladder issues and she took 14 pills a day. That by itself was not enough to get her to agree to move. She ultimately reached the decision because she got tired of the daily difficulty she had trying to maintain independence.

Even with your efforts to persuade a client that he or she ought to consider some new choice like assisted living, remember that a person who is competent can’t be forced to move anywhere. Logic has nothing to do with the fear of losing one’s independence. But keep trying and do work with the client’s family on a joint plan to help your client get to a safe decision.

What Action Can You Take?

Can you tell your client’s family about your observations? We see no ethical dilemma at all here. This is not about financial matters necessarily though it can be. The cost of moving and paying for care is a factor. But no one says you have to talk about what’s in your client’s portfolio. To be in the best position in anticipation of a client who is declining with age, get your client to identify any family or friends who could be called upon “in case of emergency”. Get more than one trusted contact. If you have a few people on the list identified by your client, call a phone meeting and discuss strategy. Gentle persuasion can work over time as it did with 92 year old Alice, who finally decided to move into a senior’s apartment. She was mighty stubborn but it did work out in the end, absent disaster. We were fortunate.

The takeaways from AgingInvestor.com:

Anticipate that long-lived clients may become unsafe living alone. Most people over age 80 need some kind of help in their lives.

You as the trusted advisor can be ready for age-related decline in your clients by having several trusted contacts in your client’s file whom you know and can call upon when safety is an issue.

If you become aware that your client is losing independence and should not be living alone, call a phone meeting with the trusted contacts to develop a strategy for working together to help your client make a good decision about moving or bringing help in.

Expand your role of merely managing the money and use your position of trust to help your client and the family keep the client physically safer.

If this all seems to be an awkward and uncomfortable thing to address, get a consultation from experts on aging at AgingInvestor.com. Our nurse-lawyer, geriatric psychologist team offers you expertise in how to approach a problem with an unsafe client and even what words to use to help them with important safety decisions.

An Important Question For Your Clients Contemplating Retirement

Jun 18, 2019 | aging, aging investor, cost of aging, cost of long term care, declining health, elder investor, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, financial judgement, long term care, nursing home, resources for senior, resources for seniors, retirement, retirement planning, senior investor, seniors finances

An Important Question For Your Clients Contemplating Retirement

Longevity is increasing, as millions of Americans are living to 90 years and above, the U.S. Census Bureau reports. Will any of these long-lived folks be the parents of your current clients? Some clients reaching retirement age themselves will be dealing with the challenges of their aging family members, even as they plan their own retirement years.

One critical question perhaps not built into your calculations for retirement income needs should be whether your clients can reasonably expect to have to support their aging parents. As reported by NPR citing the Census Bureau report, nearly 20 percent of 90- to 94-year-olds live in nursing homes. Among those 95-99, about 31 percent are in nursing homes. And in the 100+ population, 38.2 percent live in nursing homes. Who pays for that care?

Most financial advisors have a basic understanding that Medicare benefits are very limited when it comes to nursing home care. Post hospitalization, the maximum benefit is 100 days and most people do not receive even that, due to qualification requirements. For those who have to live in nursing homes long term, rather than for shorter stays involving rehabilitation such as physical therapy, the costs are paid out of pocket. The exception is for the lowest income elders. For them, Medicaid pays the cost of long term nursing home care. For everyone else, a long stay in a nursing home can wipe out an older person’s assets. The financial burden then falls on family who may have the means to prevent the impoverishment of their loved one.

Some adult children will not allow Mom or Dad to live in a nursing home long term. Maybe it was a promise they made to the aging parent. Essentially, it is no one’s first choice of where to go when care is needed. If a family has some assets but does not want to wipe out their own retirement income by paying for nursing home care or even full-time home care, the most cost effective solution is to take in the aging parent.

There is a cost involved in this choice as well, and it extends to many factors beyond money. Every family relationship in the household is impacted. Some adult children are not patient, not willing and not good at caring for an impaired aging parent in declining health. For others it is seen as an honor and a final chance to give back to the parent in gratitude for what the parent did for them over a long lifetime. Individuals vary in their perspectives, ability and willingness to take in an aging loved one.

Some families take in an aging parent and pay for part-time help, providing a significant part of the caregiving themselves. Others pay for assisted living for an aging parent, but that is not suitable for those who need care around the clock. Others allow a parent to spend down their assets until they can qualify for state paid nursing home care. The parent is then placed there somewhat as a last resort.

No matter what choice a client will make about an aging parent, it is important that the financial professional in their lives helps them see the big picture and plan according to anticipated needs for both the client and the elders for whom they feel responsible.

The Takeaways

Longevity is creating an issue for families who are facing years of decline in aging parents who may not have the means to pay for care on their own.
Responsible financial advisors must raise the question with every retiring client: is there someone in your life that you will likely have to support financially during your retirement?
Advisors and families alike must consider and plan for how any essential financial support should be handled by adult children of aging parents. Take in the parent? Supplement the parent’s income by paying for home care or assisted living?
When the means are not available to offer financial support, and the physical needs for care are extensive, it sometimes becomes necessary to allow the aging parent to become impoverished and to qualify for Medicaid. Medicaid does pay for long term nursing home care.
For those with sufficient investment income expected, financial support for aging parents can be part of an overall retirement planning strategy. It is up to the financial professional to help with this process.

Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney, AgingInvestor.com ©AgingInvestor.com™

If you the financial professional need a clear explanation of the actual costs of long term care, whether at home, in adult day centers, assisted living or skilled nursing, get the facts so you can plan with clients. It’s all laid out for you in Hidden Truths About Retirement & Long Term Care, available now. Click here to get your print, digital, or audio copy.

About Carolyn Rosenblatt and Dr. Mikol Davis

Carolyn Rosenblatt and Dr. Mikol Davis are co-authors of The Family Guide to Aging Parents (www.agingparents.com) and Succeed With Senior Clients: A Financial Advisors Guide To Best Practices. Rosenblatt, a registered nurse and elder law attorney, has more than 45 years combined experience in her professions. She has been quoted in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Money magazine and many other publications. Davis, a clinical psychologist and gerontologist, has more than 44 years experience as a mental health provider. In addition to serving his patients, Davis creates online courses and products to assist professionals and the public with understanding aging issues. Rosenblatt and Davis have been married for 34 years.

Retirement For Clients With Modest Portfolios—Making Money Last

May 6, 2019 | aging, aging investor, elder investor, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, investor, resources for senior, resources for seniors, retirement planning, senior investor, seniors finances

Retirement For Clients With Modest Portfolios—Making Money Last

By Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney, AgingParents.com

The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by 2060, nearly twenty-five percent of Americans will be age 65 and above. At the same point, the number of people age 85 and older will triple. What will they all be doing in those long retirement years? If they live into their 90s, will they run out of money?

Many who have not saved enough ultimately find new jobs. Working in retirement is something to discuss with clients who are aging, have set a retirement date and have no answers to what happens if they outlive their savings. The advisor is not a miracle worker who can stretch their dollars beyond what is reasonable with prudent investments.

Maybe some clients will consider seeking a “not too big” job that is relatively easy, compared with what they did in a prior career. For the advisor with a client whose invested assets have a predictable length that does not match life expectancy, it is wise to help them plan how to keep their dignity as they live longer than they thought possible. That is through producing some earned income, even if modest.

If an older client is determined to retire from a stressful job, that’s fine. No one needs high pressure forever. But every job is not stress filled and some are more satisfying than others. The stereotypical image of a retired elder serving fast food is not for everyone, especially for educated clients who may have more interesting choices. For some retirees, long stretches without structure lead to isolation, boredom and even to depression. The routine of some kind of work relieves that risk and can bring enjoyment a person never had in the prior career.

Some may need the double benefit of bringing in money while finding ways to be with others. Elders certainly don’t need to go from one job to another at the point of retirement, but the holistic retirement plan for a person with modest investments should include some form of earning money through work. Your client may expect that family is willing and able to provide financial support if the client runs out of money. This prospect does not appeal to many younger families who are still supporting their own children and saving for their own retirement. They fear the idea of having to support aging parents and rightly so.

Imagine a client finding something to do in retirement that pays and something the client likes. Here’s an example.

My 30-something daughter is a regular Uber user who likes to converse with her drivers in San Francisco. She reports that three of her drivers in past two weeks were over age 65. One was age 80. He told her that he had retired from a union job at age 65. His wife had passed away and he got withdrawn and bored, having no sense of purpose. He worked part-time as a warehouse floor worker and cashier. He liked the walking and being around people. He worked another few days a week driving which he enjoyed because it kept him sharp, using the app, navigating around the city, keeping track of the best ways to get places, and most importantly, he liked chatting with his passengers.

Longevity creates a pool of older workers available either part-time or full-time, not necessarily expecting a benefits package and having no lofty career aspirations. Employers in a broad variety of service fields can benefit, as can the potential workers. We have met elders at AgingParents.com who have gotten a teaching credential after retiring from a high pressure career and are happily teaching part-time. We have found others who are mentoring in businesses, working in nonprofits, doing childcare, working in retail and otherwise using their natural talents while earning a paycheck. These were all part-time positions and all were glad to be doing them.

Discussing the possibility of working with your older clients should include when in retirement the client should consider doing it. Physical and mental loss of ability can preclude work of any kind, even volunteering. They can’t necessarily count on being able to work in the later years of retirement when they may run low on cash. Someone might be fine at 70 and impaired at 85. The time for planning an appealing part time job is in the earlier stages of retirement when the client is feeling good and is not impaired by health problems.

If your client has a modest portfolio that with a conservative drawdown would only last 20 years and life expectancy is 30 years, you need to encourage working. Take the axiom “know your client” to a realistic individual plan for living long with sufficient means.

If you have trouble with these sometimes emotional, difficult conversations, contact us at AgingInvestor.com for a private one-on-one consultation so you can get the job done. Click HERE to find out more how we can help you.

Advising Your Longest-Lived Clients

Feb 21, 2019 | aging, aging investor, cost of aging, cost of long term care, declining health, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, handling money for aging parents, handling money for seniors, health, long term care insurance, resources for senior, resources for seniors, retirement planning, senior citizen investor, senior investor, seniors finances

It used to be that we could think of retirement in a kind of predictable way. People lived into their 70s perhaps, and we measured retirement by that. We used tables, algorithms and other tools to tell us how much we should save and how much we could spend in retirement. And it was all based on assumptions that may no longer apply.

Life expectancy for a woman in the U.S. in 2018 was 84 years. For a man, the figure is 80 years. Those averages do not take into account the fact that well educated and financially secure people live longer than average. This is presumably based on the notion that people who know what a healthy lifestyle is and who can afford the best medical care will outlive those who do not have those advantages. In my own county, for example, which has a high proportion of elders compared to other counties in California, one wealthy city shows a life expectancy for men of 93 years.

Suppose that your aging client lives to be 93, having retired at age 65. That’s 28 years of retirement. What the algorithms don’t clarify is what you, the advisor needs to plan for with your client during the last decade of life, from 83-93. No formula is going to help you with the individual discriminations you need to make concerning your client’s risks for care and how to assess and plan for them. They can be a substantial cost, out of pocket, not covered by Medicare, and absolutely necessary.

The way we age is determined by two main factors: hereditary tendency and lifestyle. Our genetic makeup directs only about 30% of the equation. The other 70% is driven by the way we choose to live our lives. There are plenty of folks who think that a healthy lifestyle is just too much bother. They avoid exercise, eat whatever they feel like eating, never learn to manage stress and say they’d rather die a few years sooner than give up their habits, which their doctor advises against.

Here’s the problem with that belief. Leading an unhealthy lifestyle does not just cause you to “die sooner”. Rather, it may likely cause you to live with impairments, disabilities and a need for expensive long term care for chronic health conditions. These can go on for decades.

Take obesity, for example. Over two-thirds of Americans are overweight or obese. Obviously excess weight increases our risks for all manner of health issues, including diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, and strokes. When a doctor makes a diagnosis of one of these, the person doesn’t typically just die on the spot and save a lot of expense later on. No. The medical providers will keep the person going with medications, surgery in some cases, lots of diagnostic monitoring and trips to the doctors. These chronic conditions usually lead to disability late in life, particularly when more than one of them exists in the same person.

If you have aging clients, you definitely need to understand health risks in a basic way, so that you can help your clients set aside funds for the care they are likely to need in the last years of their retirement lives. All of the chronic conditions I mentioned are manageable with an effort toward a healthy lifestyle but for those who do not wish to do the work involved, you can bet on a likely need for long term care. While you can’t predict the future, you can plan for risk. It’s what you do.

My own mother in law had high blood pressure and chronic kidney disease for decades. She worked vigorously at diet, exercise, social activities and other components of a healthy lifestyle. Heredity was not on her side. She lived to be 96. During the last 3 years of her life, she needed help. She moved to a seniors’ community where help was available and eventually, she paid for private caregivers. Her cost of living at the last part of her life was $120,000 a year. If this were your client, would he or she have at the ready $360,000 to pay for care? How about if there was no pursuit of a great lifestyle? The care expense could easily be 10 years.

The takeaway here is that advising for longevity needs to include the skill of assessing fundamental health risks that create a need for out of pocket, long term care. You don’t need to be a doctor and you can’t predict everything, but you can do what is reasonable to help your client plan. Ask the right questions. Keep track of your client’s general health picture.

To learn more about what to look for and what to ask, get Hidden Truths About Retirement & Long Term Care, available at AgingInvestor.com and on Amazon.

By Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, RN, Elder law attorney, AgingInvestor.com

Are Financial Advisors Ageists?

Feb 13, 2019 | ageist, aging investor, elder investor, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, handling money for aging parents, handling money for seniors, investor, retirement planning, senior citizen investor, senior investor, seniors finances

In a conversation with a prominent retired financial advisor from a large institution, I heard the following:

“Financial advisors are not interested in retired people. They’re taking money out. The advisors are interested in investors who are putting money in, not the other way around.”

Just hearing this generalization, whether true or not, gave me a kind of sick feeling in the pit of my stomach. Millions of Boomers fall into this category of retired. If their advisors lose interest in them when they are no longer increasing their investments, where does that leave the retired person in need of advice? The generalization sounded like age discrimination.

As a professional devoted to the well-being, financial safety and quality of life of older adults, I can only hope the statements I heard about lack of interest are untrue. I have met plenty of financial advisors who are indeed interested in maintaining their relationships with their oldest clients, not just based on whether the portfolio is increasing. They actually do care about the clients. For them, it’s not just an empty advertising slogan. I hope this is the majority!

Millions of clients served by advisors will retire soon enough or these clients are already in that phase of their lives. Competent financial advisors who have the ethics they hold themselves out as having will increase their skills in planning for lifespans for some of their clients who will live into their 90s and beyond. No logarithm nor mathematical table will do a complete job of this.

Here are some of the areas involved in longevity planning that the best advisors will fully understand by their increased training and preparation:

Social Security, and how to maximize the benefit.

Particularly with married couples, this requires specialized knowledge in order to give appropriate advice. When I asked my own long time B-D at our financial institution about it, he was very vague and couldn’t even refer me to anyone who could answer questions my husband and I raised. We fired him. We found an independent advisor who was very knowledgeable about Social Security. We referred three other people to this new advisor in the meantime and all became his clients. Take heed. Word spreads.

Long term care planning.

Telling a client who is reluctant to purchase long term care insurance that self-insuring is a choice is fine, but the longevity advisor understands how to address the risk of needing long term care and has actual figures at hand to spell this out for the client. If this is not your area of expertise, you can get a clear understanding of the costs of all types of long term care in my book, Hidden Truths About Retirement & Long Term Care. About 70% of people will need some long term care at some point. Know what it costs.

The nexus between financial planning and estate planning.

It never fails to surprise me about the disconnect between the financial advisor and the client’s estate planning attorney. Both should be working together to ensure that the client’s later years are financially safe. Successor trustees should be known by both the advisor and the lawyer, so that if a client begins to show cognitive decline, they can coordinate efforts to have the named successor take over decision making at the appropriate time. If you are worried about confidentiality of protected information, get the client’s permission in advance of any impairments, to communicate with the attorney involved. In other words, do this at the time of retirement.

Targeting relationship building with the next generation.
A loss of interest in a retired client deprives the advisor of a huge opportunity. That is, to establish a connection to and trust with your retired client’s heirs. Have you even spoken with any of them at the point of the aging investor’s retirement? If not, you have an explanation for the reason why about 80% of the heirs move their inherited assets to someone else after the patriarch or matriarch dies. The heirs can get to know you well in advance if you invite them, with your client’s permission of course, into the planning conversations. Don’t lose that chance.

In a nutshell, the older client needs the skill the financial advisor has and retirement should not change the advisor’s interest level. Keeping clients for life takes an understanding of longevity. Make it your business to do just that.

Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, RN, Elder law attorney, AgingInvestor.com

Planning for Longevity: It’s Not About “Housing”–It’s About Care

Feb 5, 2019 | aging, cost of aging, cost of long term care, custodial care, declining health, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, handling money for aging parents, handling money for seniors, health, long term care, nursing home, resources for senior, resources for seniors, retirement planning, seniors finances

The financial services industry often refers to retirement planning for the future with aging clients in terms of “housing choices”. This reflects some degree of misperception about what happens as we age. For healthy people of retirement age, there is little interest in planning for the need for care and planning for loss of independence. People usually resist talking about it. We don’t choose to lose our independence. It happens. It is up to the advisor to raise it if you want to advise for longevity. The subject is emotional and can be difficult.

Where we need to get help when we can’t be independent any longer is really a choice about care, rather than housing. This is not house shopping. Does a client want to pay for care in her own home when that time comes? Most would say yes, they want to remain at home. They then must calculate what a home care worker costs and whether that is the best way to receive the help they are likely to need one day with their activities. Can the resources be available to enable that choice of where care will be given?

If an elderly client is living alone and can’t manage at home anymore without assistance, there are indeed choices, often driven by the degree of care needed and the cost of getting it. Elders may not be interested any longer in maintaining a house, cooking, shopping, and other necessary chores. For them, assisted living may be desirable because their daily lives will be different and free from the burden of the household that has become unmanageable. The choice to go to assisted living is usually not one a client is going to make because of wanting to downsize into an apartment for its own sake. Rather that is the price of going to the place where assistance is on hand. Again it is to receive care, not because they love the idea of not having their home any longer. For many elders, downsizing from a house to an assisted living apartment is a difficult adjustment, required because of physical or mental changes of aging. From that perspective it is a choice forced upon them.

A factor every advisor should know is that the likelihood of living alone increases with age. Almost half of women age 75+ lived alone in 2010, according to the Institute on Aging. The “choice” of a different living arrangement is brought on by safety and care concerns, often raised by their adult children.

It will be good for every advisor who wants to help clients plan for longevity to consider that their role is to introduce the issue of possibly needing care in the future, as about 70% of us will one day. If your client has you in her life, she already has housing. Planning for “housing” is a misnomer. Focus on places and choices where care can be delivered. Having no care plan can be disastrous, as sudden health crises can force decisions without considering the cost of care in advance.

In helping to educate your client about where he or she can receive care, the costs of all the offerings available in most areas are spelled out in detail in our book, Hidden Truths About Retirement & Long Term Care. You can develop quick expertise on the subject there. Skilled advice about longevity for your aging clients requires knowing your numbers, what care options are available where they live and how much they can expect to spend for that care. Smart advisors gather the data before a crisis happens and urge clients to look at it with them.

By Carolyn L. Rosenblatt, RN, Elder law attorney, AgingInvestor.com

Where Will Your Client Live In Older Age?

Jan 18, 2019 | aging, aging in place, aging investor, cost of aging, declining health, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, handling money for aging parents, handling money for seniors, health, long term care, resources for seniors, retirement planning, seniors finances

Most advisors who even ask this question of their retirement-aged clients never spend time on it. About 90% of those asked say they want to remain in their own homes as long as possible. That sounds fine. Until one faces physical decline, cognitive impairment or both. The advisor providing competent guidance about financing aging at home had better know the facts.

None of us like to think about losing physical ability or needing help. We abhor the thought of losing our total independence. In our view at AgingInvestor.com, the only advice clients are getting is about the long term picture is whether or not to purchase long term care insurance. Since most people don’t do that, the actual costs of living at home can boggle the mind. It’s the best advisor’s obligation to educate your client about the risks of the plan to age in place, just as it is your obligation to educate them about balancing their portfolios. You are giving the client added value if you take the time to talk them through the risks and dollars they may need to have available.

Here are some briefly stated facts from a real case in which an 89 year old wanted to age in place and his wife promised he would never have to leave home.

At the outset of his declining health, he had about $3M in invested assets. His portfolio was healthy and balanced for his age, according to conventional wisdom. He began to lose his ability to walk due to multiple medical problems. His wife hired home helpers, three days a week at first. As his conditions progressed he needed more and more help. He had to have a wheelchair, and a special van. A stair chair was installed in their two-story home. By the time he reached age 95, he was spending over $150,000 a year on care and assistance around the clock. In the space of time during which he was steadily losing independence until he passed away at 95, his assets were depleted to the tune of $2M. He lived in a higher end market for the needed help but the reality is that in any market, the kind of care he needed would be very expensive.

For him, aging in place was more costly than a skilled nursing facility would have been. Home modifications, private caregivers, (none of whom were licensed nurses), equipment, medications, adaptive devices, etc. drained his resources by 2/3. And not everyone has as much invested as he had to even start the journey. His wife had her own assets and she paid the cost of household maintenance, taxes, food, and utilities with her funds. Had she relied on him for those things too, there would likely have been little left at the end of his life.

It is not all doom and gloom however. Many clients live rather well in their last years without all the care this gentleman needed. Some get by with family caregiving help, and some have fewer medical conditions. But if you are going to competently help your clients plan for longevity, it’s essential to understand the real out of pocket costs of aging in place or anywhere else outside the home. If you want to add value to your services to older clients, know what they need to know to properly anticipate what can happen with living into one’s 90s and beyond. Learn all the actual costs of care for every aging client option in our book, Hidden Truths About Retirement & Long Term Care. Be well prepared to walk your client through the scenarios they could face in their futures. You distinguish yourself from other advisors when you sharpen your knowledge in planning for longevity.

By Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney, AgingInvestor.com

Do you know your clients? Watch our 1 minute video.

Oct 3, 2017 | aging investor, elder investor, elderly, finances for elders, financial advisors, financial judgement, handling money for seniors, retirement planning, senior investor, seniors finances

To order The Hidden Truths About Retirement & Long Term Care Book For Financial Advisors, Click Here

Dr. Mikol Davis and Carolyn Rosenblatt, co-founders of AgingInvestor.com

Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Elder Law Attorney offers a wealth of experience with aging to help you create tools so you can skillfully manage your aging clients. You will understand your rights and theirs so you can stay safe and keep them safe too.

Dr. Mikol Davis, Psychologist, Gerontologist offers in depth of knowledge about diminished financial capacity in older adults to help you strategize best practices so you can protect your vulnerable aging clients.

They are the authors of "Succeed With Senior Clients: A Financial Advisors Guide To Best Practice," and "Hidden Truths About Retirement And Long Term Care," available at AgingInvestor.com offers accredited cutting edge on-line continuing education courses for financial professionals wanting to expand their expertise in best practices for their aging clients. To learn more about our courses click HERE

Three Retirement Mistakes Sure To Create A Mess For Your Client’s Family

Apr 7, 2017 | aging investor, finances for elders, financial advisors, retirement planning

With 10,000 Boomers turning 65 every day, no wonder there is so much talk about retirement. You may be planning busily to get your clients a stable income and keep the portfolio on track. But besides advice on how to “have a secure retirement” and “maintain your lifestyle” there’s some important information too few are taking about. That’s the retirement-era mistakes people make that are pretty much guaranteed to leave their families in a stressful mess no matter how well you manage their finances. Long experience here at AgingInvestor.com and AgingParents.com has revealed much about retired older clients. We hear about what your aging clients do and don’t do to make life stressful for their adult children. Here are what we call the Top Three of numerous errors aging clients make that you can at least remind them to avoid. Maybe you don’t get too far into their personal lives and relationships with their adult children, but we think you should go farther than is traditional for you to do. Their financial safety is at stake.

Mistake Number One: They never discuss finances with their spouses or adult kids. It’s private, they think.

The problem with this is that they’re not going to live forever. Family members need to know where the funds are, what you’re managing and what to do when the patriarch or matriarch becomes impaired or dies. Most people do suffer health declines as they age and millions will develop dementia. What then? You can’t take direction from a client who is too incapacitated to make a decision about finances. Encourage family meetings. Persuade your older clients of the necessity to communicate about finances so you can rely on a surrogate decision maker when or if your client loses mental capacity. You need to take leadership on this if the client doesn’t do it. The family needs to be prepared or suffer extreme stress when things go wrong for the aging parent.

Mistake Number Two: They believe they’ll never fall for a scam. They’re way too smart for that.

Very smart and capable folks get taken by scammers every day. In fact, some of your experienced and capable clients develop Alzheimer’s disease and can cover it up for a long time. But they lose financial decision-making capacity early in the disease process when other functions seem fine. Impaired people are more vulnerable than ever. You need to involve your client and family in awareness of the latest scams and fraud targeting seniors. Make it your business to give them information and links to good resources like the AARP Fraud Watch Network. They need to be aware of telephone scams, ID theft, and Internet thieves. When you protect their money, you protect your fees. If your client gets taken by a scam, chances are their family will have to help clean up the mess.

Mistake Number Three: They think they don’t need to plan for long-term care. They’ll never need it of course.

This mistake involves both you as a financial professional as well as retirement age clients in denial about ever needing expensive help for disabling conditions. For your part, your industry is inaccurately providing statistics about how much a retired couple, age 65 will need for “out of pocket medical expenses” and you guide clients accordingly. That is not fair to them because it is not truthful. Out of pocket medical expenses are not limited to the average cost of Medicare supplemental insurance and non-covered prescription costs. That’s what you may have relied on. Wrong. How about hearing aids, dental work, help at home from an agency worker, adult day centers and the many other aspects of long-term needs? Educate yourself first and then advise your clients. Long-term care could otherwise bankrupt them. And the family will bear the burden of caring for them then.

Perhaps your viewpoint is limited to the funds you manage and the income targets you and the client have decided upon. But there is far more to the retirement picture than that. We encourage you to take a deeper dive into retirement planning and gain a realistic view of how you can help clients avoid these big mistakes.

Dr. Mikol Davis and Carolyn Rosenblatt, co-founders of AgingInvestor.com

Dr. Mikol Davis and Carolyn Rosenblatt, co-founders of AgingInvestor.com

Recent Posts