Do you have any clients over age 65? They may not know about: the grandma scam. Although the government, local agencies and sometimes the media publicize these predatory traps for elders, somehow the word doesn’t get around fast or far enough. Here at AgingInvestor.com, we work with a lot of families who have elders and we’ve been sounding the alarm since 2007 on this one. But it persists. Intelligent people, doctors, lawyers, professionals and non professionals alike are being victimized. Anyone can be caught off guard.
A call from a young person is made to the targeted older person, often at night, after the aging person is asleep. Half awake, grandma answers the phone. ”It’s me, Grandma” the caller says. Grandma immediately falls into the trap and says “Michael, is that you?” Or any grandchild who is named instantly becomes the identity of the caller. ”Yes, it’s Michael” the scammer says quickly. He then says he’s in trouble in some named city far away or even a foreign country. He’s lost his passport, or been arrested, he’s in the hospital, he’s very sick, or some concocted tale of needing help desperately. There is pain in his voice. He says how much he loves his Grandma and please don’t tell his parents. He needs money right away for the bill or for a laywer to get him out of jail or to get a new passport, etc. Would Grandma please wire the money? The targeted victim has to act right away. But repeatedly, older gullible people are swayed by the feeling of wanting to help a grandchild in need. And they don’t take time to think.
Grandma is so concerned, she gets that cash wired to the scammer right away. She doesn’t check anything out and she doesn’t call her son or daughter, the parents of the fake grandchild. It takes a while before she realizes she’s been had. Millions of dollars are lost this way, in smaller amounts at a time. No matter how much the press reports this kind of scam, the thieves keep at it, as they know that about one in fifty calls will result in getting money from an unsuspecting person.
Why are these con artists getting away with it? Dialing for dollars all day is quicker and easier than robbing a bank and it gets better results. The con artists rarely get caught. The money, once wired, is gone forever from the victim. And due to shame and embarrassment, victims rarely report the scam artists to the police. Con men buy names from subscription lists with likely senior citizen readers or from other information brokers. Some have the ages of their targets and their addresses. Sometimes the more sophisticated ones have even researched the names of family members, so calling Grandma is more likely to sound credible. If the caller’s voice isn’t recognizable, there is always an excuse: I have a cold, I’m really sick, or anything that works to persuade Grandma it’s really her grandson.
What’s the takeaway?
Your client can be easily tricked under the right circumstances. Wanting a call from grandkids is the starting point for scammers. It triggers an emotional response to the plea for help. “I love you” is something the grandparent wants to hear and the emotional hook is the basis of the con man’s success. Warn every aging client to be aware of the scam and to ask the caller a question only a real grandchild would know: the name of a pet, a parent’s birth date or a nickname.
Financial professionals are in a unique position to educate clients about finances and how to keep from losing money. Thwarting abuse is so important! Have you ever had a client get scammed? Have you seen ripoffs from their own family members? We’d like to hear your perspective on this. Comments welcome.
Learn what you can do about elder abuse at AgingInvestor.com in a one hour accredited course. Check it out here.
There is something about memory loss that should raise a red flag when it comes to your aging clients and their investments. Are you prepared?
By 2030, there will be 72.1 million people in the U.S. over age 65, or “elders”. 7.7 million of them will have Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). This directly translates to a large number of impaired clients making or attempting to make financial transactions and decisions. Some of those transactions could be with you.
According to respected researcher, attorney and neuropsychologist at the University of Alabama, Burmingham, Dr. Daniel Marson, losing capacity for financial decisions is something we need to be ready for, as it affects a huge part of our population. The problem is growing. Financial institutions, organizations and banks need to take preventive steps to avoid financial losses and exploitation of their clients.
What are the implications for the financial services industry? Demographics and dementia demonstrate that policies need to change and institutions need to explicitly plan for diminished financial capacity in their investors. We’re not just talking about escalating a matter to compliance when a client seems to be behaving oddly. We are suggesting that institutions and organizations get over the brick wall excuse that it’s not their problem, it’s the family’s problem. Financial professionals need to change the thinking that privacy concerns prevent them at all times from doing anything unless the client gives permission. A client who is impaired for decision-making may not be willing or able to give permission for you to discuss a problem with family until it is too late. Getting permission needs to be a proactive mandate.
Privacy does not have to be a problem if your organization, institution, or you, as an individual plan for the possibility of diminished capacity as a part of all investment transactions. That planning will include obtaining a special authorization for the financial services professional to contact a designated person when certain criteria are met. That, of course, means thinking through, with the input of aging experts, the criteria that would trigger the use of the special authorization.
Further, one should develop an agreed upon plan of action for the financial professional when the criteria that demonstrate diminished capacity are identified. This will take collaboration among all the players in institutions, so that policy development is uniform, regulation-compliant, and fair to the aging person who may be developing impairment.
Most importantly, a secure path of communication and action for the institution needs to be in place. No one with a questionable aging client should be left wondering:
Should I escalate this to compliance now, or does it take more?
Do I have the authority to contact a family member, or does that violate my client’s privacy and the laws about privacy?
What steps should I take now to protect myself?
Clients with memory loss are likely going to become impaired for making financial decisions at some point. Do you want to lose the assets under your management because your aging investor can’t figure out what you are saying and can’t approve what you need to do to protect him from disaster? We see an absolute connection, based on very solid research, between the dangerous red flag of memory loss and financial loss.
If you have heard the term “sliver tsunami” you may know that it refers to the massive wave of aging folks in our population. In case you haven’t noticed, it has already hit and your feet are getting wet.
Get a one page checklist you can use to identify ten signs of diminished capacity by clicking HERE. Be ready for aging clients and know what to do!
U.S. Senator Patty Murray, U.S. Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez, and WHCOA Executive Director Nora Super discuss aging issues at WHCOA Seattle Regional Forum – Credit: white houseconferenceonaging. gov
What Is This Conference and Why Is It Important?
Every ten years the Federal government sponsors a Conference on Aging.
The relevance of this conference to financial professionals is that it identifies the most common problems aging Americans face and it provides direction for planning for seniors’ needs. It is worth reading the final report. You likely have some boomer age clients and perhaps some aging clients as well. Be aware of what is important to them and you’re likely to keep them as clients.
Who Attended the Conference?
Beginning in February 2015, WHCOA held a series of regional forums for its Conference on Aging to engage with older Americans, their families, caregivers, leaders in the aging field, and others on the key
issues affecting older Americans. The concept was to hear about seniors’ issues and plan accordingly. The series of discussions was co-sponsored by AARP and planned in coordination with the Leadership Council of Aging Organizations, a coalition of more than 70 groups,
Each forum included 200 invited guests — older Americans, family and professional caregivers, aging experts and others. These discussions took place across the country.
Reading about the subjects they discussed and the conclusions reached in the conference Final Report was not a surprise to us at AgingInvestor.com, as we are in the field. But one thing did surprise me completely: no one gave much mention to the need for thorough financial education and planning
with professional help.
There was mention of the Department of Labor’s initiative to facilitate State creation of retirement savings programs. There was also discussion of the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s recently issued guidance clarifying that employers sponsoring defined benefit pension plans generally may not offer lump
sum payments to retirees to replace their regular monthly pensions. As noted in a recent Government Accountability Office report, such lump sum payments transfer longevity risk and investment risk from employers to individual retirees, putting retirees at risk of being unable to maintain their standard
of living or outliving their assets in retirement. Wouldn’t financial advice help? No mention was made of the value of at least seeking advice from financial professionals to maintain income while investing responsibly for those who did get a lump sum payment.
The report emphasizes the need for providing lifetime income and seems to favor employers offering annuities as part of retirement planning. The Treasury and Labor Departments previously have issued
a series of guidance documents encouraging plan sponsors to offer responsible annuity options to help protect retirees from outliving their savings.
The Gap
That may work for some, but I found myself at a loss as to why mention was not made of the importance of professional guidance in financial planning, which may be the best way to ensure that an individual
does not, in fact outlive his savings. That’s your job.
Opportunity for Financial Advisors
An obvious opportunity for financial advisors is to offer financial education to members of the public. Some attendees will not have enough to make new investments, but others will. With 10,000 people turning 65 every day and the oldest boomers turning 70 now, financial advisors can play a key role in helping aging members of society do better with managing their money as they age. Advisors can improve the sometimes negative public perception of the industry by stepping up, putting on few seminars with the basics of saving and investing and capturing some new clients in the process.
Need to update your information about long term care? Get a short book that tells you how to best work with your aging clients, including planning for the costs they may worry about the most. Working With Aging Clients is a sure bet, available at AgingInvestor.com.
Financial abuse of elders has been called the crime of the century. A recent study shows that it costs seniors over $36B per year in the US. Every hand is needed to prevent and stop this crime of opportunity, including the help of financial professionals. We review the nine domains of financial capacity and describe the seven warning signs that your client may be a victim of financial abuse. We suggest ways that a senior-specific policy can offer advisors a clear path to follow when client conduct puts you on notice of a diminished capacity problem. We show you “hero stories” of financial professionals who took action and did stop abuse.
Learning objectives:
To improve your understanding of the enormity of the problem of financial elder abuse in the US.
To help you understand the legal options that exist to address elder abuse, both in criminal and civil venues.
To improve your understanding of how diminished capacity for financial decisions leads to vulnerability to abuse by predators.
To provide a clear understanding of the seven warning signs of financial abuse.
To provide you with an action plan that so you can take protective action for your clients who appear to be at risk.
The family meeting is the bedrock of a successful intergenerational wealth transfer. But how does the financial professional conduct these? What are the right ways and wrong ways to go about it?
If you want to learn a process, the kind of team you need and the best ways to have family meetings with your client and his heirs, you need this course. We will give you specific pointers on how to get started, how to deal with problematic family issues and how to bring in the best experts to help you. We cover a lot in an hour, so be ready to learn. You’ll come away a lot wiser about establishing a great relationship with your client and those who will inherit his assets.
Summary of course:
Family meetings are the bedrock of successful intergenerational wealth transfers. In this course you will learn how to help your client develop a family mission statement, and how to create an atmosphere of learning for any willing heirs who will take over responsibility for a family’s assets. There may be many different kinds of assets a high net worth family has. Heirs can’t keep control over those different assets without excellent preparation. We show you how to get that preparation in place and how to make sure it works. We also teach you about the warning signs of a family that is too dysfunctional for you to be able to help with wealth transfer. Your understanding and confidence in handling a family meeting will grow by leaps and bounds with this course.
Learning objectives:
To improve your understanding of how wealth transfers fail and how to change this
To enhance your ability to facilitate communication about transfer of wealth in families
To improve your ability to retain management of assets held by aging investors that they intend to pass to their heirs
To increase communication skills for developing trust between yourself, your client and her heirs
It’s pretty well known that intergenerational wealth transfers fail about 70% of the time. What makes the other 30% successful? If you’d like to learn how you can help your client be part of one of the successful families, you’ll need to understand the critical parts of success and how to achieve them. Communication is one of the things we talk about in this course. Who better to advise us than an experienced psychologist who has worked with families for over 40 years? Dr. Davis has given us great information to help ease your way and give you confidence in creating a path to a wealth transfer that works well.
Update on what the SEC, FINRA an NASAA have in mind for financial professionals across the country in how they do business with clients over age 65. Review of the research these agencies have done, Model Rules regulators have created and what exemplary things they found firms and organizations doing for aging clients. They all want financial professionals to be more protective of aging investors. They envision mandates for reporting financial abuse of elders will and expand mandates into other areas. This course highlights areas regulators expect advisors to address, such as training in senior issues and increased communication with aging clients. It provides specifics on how to get ready for what the regulators want so that you will not have to scramble to comply with mandates.
Learning Objectives:
Understand the regulators’ concept of a “senior program” and how you can create one.
Know the Model Rules about financial abuse the regulators have already publicly posted.
Know what other firms across the US are doing about aging investors that you should be doing too.
Know what action steps you can and should take now to be ready for mandates.
Our population is living longer than ever. The risk of dementia rises with age. That means that most of us are going to encounter problems of aging in our clients.
We need to recognize the red flags of impairment that will affect financial capacity. These include:
Cognitive signs, such as memory loss and difficulty understanding the conversation
Communication, calculations and orientation problems
Emotional signs that are out of character for your client.
It is essential for every financial professional to understand the complexity of financial capacity and appreciate how many parts it has. There are 9 domains of financial capacity. You cannot determine if a person is impaired or not just by talking on the phone with her or having a brief meeting in which you give information.
A normal social conversation with the client is not a measure of whether or not the client has diminished financial capacity.
The more aware you are as a professional, the better chance you have of protecting your client from loss and protecting yourself as well.
Learning objectives:
Prepare yourself for the wave of aging clients by understanding the demographics of our aging population and the risks of dementia associated with aging.
Understand the 9 domains of financial capacity and learn how to spot problems with any one of them.
Be able to identify red flags of impaired cognition that should prompt you to act.
Develop a personal plan for what to do when you see warning signs of diminishing financial capacity
When your clients spend time during this season with their aging loved ones, let them know that it’s an opportunity to look out for signs that a loved one needs help. Some things are possible tipoffs that they should get involved in helping monitor their aging parents’ spending, giving and susceptibility to scams. Educating them about these signs gives the client the impression that you understand and that you care. Your Boomer clients may have parents or other relatives in their 80’s, 90’s and beyond. You can help both clients and their aging family members stay safer.
Encourage them to watch out for these three signs when they see loved ones at their parents’ homes:
Evidence of unpaid bills. Older folks begin to lose the capacity to keep track of finances very early in the process of any form of dementia. If bill collectors are calling, or they see dunning notices, that is a red flag. They could be forgetting what to pay or when to pay a bill. Insurance can be cut off, utilities can be stopped and a lot of other consequences flow from this forgetfulness. Adult children can help by offering to do the bill paying, putting it online or otherwise keeping watch over bills. Your Boomer clients could be stuck with having to support their aging parents if the elders lose the ability to manage their money.
Too much “charitable” giving to anyone who asks. Scammers call seniors and pose as anybody from anywhere. Unsuspecting elders believe them and do not check out the validity of the charity they claim to represent. Remind your clients to caution their senior loved ones to ask for detailed information about anyone who solicits them, including name, address and phone number. They should to call the charity and verify that the solicitation was from them.
Evidence of a new “friend” who seems overly involved in an aging parent’s life, especially if he or she has access to personal information such as Social Security number, credit cards and bank accounts. There are predators out there waiting for a chance to get to the money and run. Particularly with a parent who has memory loss, manipulation and theft are all too easy for a person just hanging around waiting for an opportunity to steal. At AgingInvestor.com we suggest that adult children closely monitor seniors’ accounts and question anything odd immediately.
Client education needs to be about more than what products will yield the best return and how to make money last. It has to be about your client’s life too. And since regulators want all advisors to educate clients about issues that affect them, this is one perfect for the educational effort. Feel free to copy this email and send it out modified a bit, with your name on it. Your clients will appreciate you!
One benefit of the increasing life expectancies for Americans is that more people have bonus years for enjoying the company of their aging parents.
But all is not rosy. Those extended years also boost the odds that parents could go broke or suffer from dementia and be unable to make financial decisions for themselves.
That can leave adult children perplexed about when and whether they should step in and find out what’s happening with their parents’ money, says Carolyn Rosenblatt, a registered nurse and elder law attorney.
“Unfortunately, it’s not always easy to have those conversations,” says Rosenblatt, co-author with her husband, Dr. Mikol Davis, of The Family Guide to Aging Parents (www.agingparents.com) and Succeed With Senior Clients: A Financial Advisors Guide To Best Practices.
“Some stubborn parents just refuse to talk about their money. No matter what their adult children say to them, they put it off, change the subject or tell their children it’s none of their business.”
Of course, many adult children aren’t in any particular hurry to broach the subject either, says Davis, a clinical psychologist and gerontologist.
“They have their own discomfort about it and procrastinate,” he says. “Then a crisis comes up and no one has any idea what the parents have or where to find important documents.”
But Rosenblatt and Davis say it’s critical that these conversations take place so that the offspring can gather information about such subjects as the parent’s income and expenses, where legal documents are kept, and what kind of medical or long-term-care insurance the parent might have.
The success of these conversations often comes down to how you approach the subject, Rosenblatt and Davis say. They offer a few tips:
End the procrastination by picking a date for the talk. Make an appointment with yourself to bring up the subject at a specific time. An opportune time to schedule this is after a birthday, a family event or a holiday where other family members are together who may share in the responsibility for the aging parents in the future.
Show respect. Tell your parents you understand and respect their reluctance to discuss their finances. You can even make the conversation about yourself rather than about them. Say that you’re concerned that if something went wrong, you would be completely lost as to how to help them.
Address their fears head-on. Let them know you understand they are worried that if they talk about their finances their independence might be taken away. You might add that you want them to maintain their independence as long as possible and you’re willing to help accomplish that, but you can’t do it without the correct information.
“Getting past an aging parent’s fear about talking about finances can be daunting,” Rosenblatt says. “But a well-planned strategy for approaching the subject will give you your best chance.”
About Carolyn Rosenblatt and Dr. Mikol Davis
Carolyn Rosenblatt and Dr. Mikol Davis are co-authors of The Family Guide to Aging Parents (www.agingparents.com) and Succeed With Senior Clients: A Financial Advisors Guide To Best Practices. Rosenblatt, a registered nurse and elder law attorney, has more than 45 years combined experience in her professions. She has been quoted in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Money magazine and many other publications. Davis, a clinical psychologist and gerontologist, has more than 44 years experience as a mental health provider. In addition to serving his patients, Davis creates online courses and products to assist professionals and the public with understanding aging issues. Rosenblatt and Davis have been married for 34 years.
Dr. Mikol Davis and Carolyn Rosenblatt, co-founders of AgingInvestor.com
Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Elder Law Attorney offers a wealth of experience with aging to help you create tools so you can skillfully manage your aging clients. You will understand your rights and theirs so you can stay safe and keep them safe too.
Dr. Mikol Davis, Psychologist, Gerontologist offers in depth of knowledge about diminished financial capacity in older adults to help you strategize best practices so you can protect your vulnerable aging clients.
So many professionals we talk to are worried about aging clients, those in their 80’s, 90’s and older. And for good reason. Mikol’s mother is now 92 and she lives independently. She is not exactly a sophisticated investor or consumer. She is very sharp mentally, but that does not mean she could not be manipulated. She has already been taken advantage of by one financial advisor. He got caught though. By us. We took a quick video of Alice, and without naming any names, you can see what she has to say about what the investment this advisor put her into. Click on image to see Video.
We have a very special advantage with Alice. She is willing to let us watch over her investments and her day to day financial life. Not only is she open to receiving this support, she generally welcomes it. That is not an advantage every family has. But even if your aging client or loved one is less than willing to allow those in their lives who can protect them from harm to discuss their financial business, they may be willing to make at least one concession. We recommend that you try for this, suggest it to all the aging folks in your world and take one small step in the direction of their protection.
The professional crooks are at it again. The U.S. Attorney’s office recently charged six defendants with yet another telemarketing fraud scheme targeting the elderly. The allegations are that the con artists sought out and preyed upon the elderly through their lottery scam. We see these reports often in the news, to the point that they seem very repetitive. The characters and the amount of money stolen from elders changes but the methods are the same over and over. They caught the scammers this time and charged them with theft of a total of $400,000 from various victims. That’s the least of it. Other scams bring in millions from their vulnerable victims.
Why do elders fall for these things? Why don’t they get that the “Nigerian prince” or the “Jamaican Lottery” are clearly bogus and not to be trusted? (more…)
Carrie got concerned when her brothers suddenly began to exclude her from their Mom’s financial affairs. It didn’t feel right, but she wasn’t sure she could do anything about it. When she called, I got that “slow burn” feeling that comes over me when I hear about financial elder abuse. As a consultant for folks with aging parents, it’s not the first time I’ve heard this kind of story. (more…)
With $30 trillion in wealth being transferred between generations now and over the next decades, advisors are missing a huge opportunity. If you are fine with losing your chance to retain the next generation after your current clients transfer their wealth, do nothing different. You can count on 66% of your client’s heirs taking their business elsewhere. If you would like to change the odds for yourself, you need to do a lot more than “get to know your client’s family”.
That vague advice will not result in adult children of your current clients seeing you as a desirable person to trust. If you want to establish relationships with the heirs, take the advice of those who have researched this problem of client flight and do more.
As you stay in the financial advising business for a time, you will surely see more aging clients. People are living longer than ever in history. They are part of your practice now or they will be soon enough. With aging come risks: cognitive decline, physical limitations and the need for care that can get very expensive. Will diminished capacity make your client vulnerable to abuse? Can you help protect your client by taking proactive steps right now?
You want to be of service, but you don’t want to go overboard and become someone’s social worker. What can you do to ensure your clients’ safety and well being as they age? Here are five tips for the conscious advisor who knows your client beyond managing the money.
The securities industry is pushing to impose temporary holds on certain transactions that may be precipitated by a clients’ declining mental capacity, or purported loved ones who may be trying to swindle them. Sounds good in theory. Too bad it won’t solve the problem of financial abuse. Does the industry think that waiting is going to make the problem of predators go away?
Here is an example of a real case in which this exact method of the broker waiting and hoping didn’t do a thing for the elder who was being abused. READ what happened:
Have you ever heard the term “undue influence”? from time to time, Most people don’t really understand what it means. Is it just some weird legal thing? Or should you understand it? When it comes to seniors and financial abuse, the term becomes very important, because undue influence can readily lead to financial abuse.The legal concept of undue influence goes way back in history to the 1600s. A lot of our law in the US is based on what our British ancestors did. Sure enough there is an old case in which a woman pretended to love an older man and pressured or influenced him to give her all his money and property upon his death. She didn’t love him. She was married to someone else. The elderly man changed his will and left everything to her, and not to his own family. His family sued, she lost and they got the estate he would have left to them if he hadn’t been under the influence of this woman.
The English court found that she had used undue influence on him to get him to change his will.Centuries have passed but the same problem exists today. People use their relationship with someone to get them to give money or property to the influencer. We hear about it all the time at AgingParents.com where we work with families helping them deal with issues about aging loved ones. The struggle in families about control over an aging parent’s finances often comes about because someone thinks another family member is using undue influence over a vulnerable elder. And sometimes it’s true!Laws about undue influence vary from state to state. Where I live in CA, we have a really good definition that helps people prove when someone was under undue influence of another person. Keeping it simple and non-legal sounding this is the essence of the definition: Undue influence is excessive persuasion that causes another person to act or refrain from acting by overcoming that person’s free will and results in something that isn’t in the influenced person’s best interests. A person who is elderly, frail, dependent on others for care or who is undergoing a lot of stress is particularly vulnerable.
The influencer is usually in a position of trust, like a family member or a position of authority over the one being influenced. The person in authority could be a professional, such as a financial advisor or lawyer, or it could be a caregiver.
What are some of the classic warning signs of undue influence?
Here are five of them:
1. The victim is vulnerable, such as shortly after a spouse has died or because he or she has dementia and can’t make good decisions. But a person can be vulnerable just because of being lonely too.
2. The influencer assumes power, authority or control over the one being influenced. This could come from the relationship, where the one being influenced thinks the influencer can be trusted and doesn’t question them.
3. Isolation of the senior, and doing things in secret, in a hurry or because the influencer tells the victim that everyone else is against her.
4. Sudden changes in a long-standing estate plan, including a will and or trust. The so-called “natural heirs” or family are cut out of what they were going to inherit and it goes to someone outside the family as a result of the senior being influenced to make those changes.
5. Something happens that is not fair or reasonable for the victim. For example, another seizes control over their assets and they can no longer choose what to do with them. Or the elder’s home is sold and he is forced to go to a nursing home against his will. These are examples of harm or an unfair result to the victim.
Undue influence is legally related to financial abuse. Harm to the elder in some way is the result and it always involves money, property or an agreement that affects the elder’s welfare.
We hope you have a good idea now of undue influence. If you see any of the warning signs happening to someone in your life, to a client, family member or friend, speak up!
Seek legal advice from an elder law attorney or report the harm you see to Adult Protective Services.
Working together, we can all do something to stop elder abuse.
Most of us hear about unscrupulous family members taking advantage of their aging parents or grandparents. And everyone knows that internet scams abound. The one in which the scammer calls an elder and pretends to be a grandchild in trouble is notorious. And unfortunately, successful as it still goes on. Funds from grandma’s account get wired to Western Union and the thief disappears.
Financial elder abuse is rampant. The National Center On Elder Abuse puts the amount stolen from elders each year at $2.9B. But a privately run recent study calculated the amount at a shocking $36B+ per year. Who is doing this to our seniors?
Family members are the most frequent abusers of elders, because of access, exploiting the relationship of trust, and knowing just how easily manipulated a parent or other loved one can become with aging and dementia. Family members usually know how much money their parents have and how to get the parent to either give it to them or give them control over it so they can take it without the parent’s knowledge. Sadly, we see this often in our consulting work at AgingParents.com.
Caregivers, who also develop a relationship of trust with their care recipients, have the advantage of being with the elder in unsupervised situations. Ruthless caregivers get the elder to sign a power of attorney and being dependent on the caregiver, the elder may be fearful and intimidated if she does not acquiesce to the demands of the caregiver. In one case, a caregiver managed to steal $4M from a 74 year old client with multiple sclerosis who became physically unable to manage for herself. The caregiver got a power of attorney and opened 67 accounts in eleven banks. One bank finally caught on and reported their suspicions, but it was too late. The caregiver went to jail but the elder died before the criminal’s sentencing.
In spite of the easy access family and caregivers have to seniors, the most dollars are actually stolen from elders every year by professionals. That includes broker-dealers, insurance sales persons, lawyers and others in a position of both trust and authority to manipulate or outright steal elders’ funds. About a third of FINRA prosecutions involve elders. There are ripoff artists among us.
One thing that doesn’t seem to change over time is the reality that most cases of elder abuse go unreported to authorities and are therefore never prosecuted. The thieves get away with it. In one case we saw in our office, a 92 year old whose son had power of attorney for her took thousands of dollars from her bank account and refused to account for it. We were involved in helping her change the authority he had over her finances. I spoke with her and described that what her son had done was wrong and was a crime. She knew it was wrong and did not want to take action. Her response: “I don’t want my son prosecuted”.
Many elders are more frail and less willing to pursue legal remedies than a younger person may be. They suffer from shame, depression and embarrassment that they have been so taken in by anyone. Some just don’t have the energy to fight back and the thieves know this. They count on it.
What can the concerned financial professional do about financial abuse? There are ways you can be more vigilant and protective of clients than ever. Here are five things to keep in mind for any aging client.
Know that even at the very earliest stages of dementia, a client is likely to be moderately impaired for making safe financial decisions. Pay attention to their ability or lack of it to understand complex or risky products such as non-traded REITS, which regulators disapprove of selling to seniors. Avoid suggesting or offering any products which require significant analysis by the client if you have even a hint of cognitive decline in that client.
Know that age alone is a risk factor for developing dementia and its accompanying diminished capacity. By the time your clients reach age 85, at least a third of them will have Alzheimer’s Disease or other dementia. Two out of three persons affected by Alzheimer’s are women. Be especially vigilant with your aging female clients.
Know your client. If he or she departs from a long standing spending pattern and you suddenly see unexplained large cash withdrawals, be suspicious, ask questions and probe. Someone could have gotten control over your client’s account. Don’t stand idly by. Get involved and find out. Report abuse if you suspect it. Take action to stop the abuse. Protect your client.
If you work in an organization where professional colleagues have aging clients and there is opportunity to either sell them unsuitable investment products or otherwise manipulate these elders, lobby your organization for enhanced and more frequent scrutiny of all client accounts for people age 65 and up. The Federal Government and state laws define an “elder” as someone 65 and above. Watch those accounts more often and in more detail.
Develop your own best practices, senior-specific policy, in writing. Training in best practices and commitment to your clients’ safety will enable you to get it right. Once you have a clear policy in place for yourself independently or for your organization, everyone can respond to red flags of diminished capacity and warning signs of elder abuse in a uniform way. That will enhance your ability to honor your clients so you can protect him from predators.
Imagine this scenario. The person making all financial decisions was the man of the house. His somewhat timid wife, married to him for many years, never wanted the responsibility to decide how to invest. They had a multimillion dollar estate. Then Harry, her husband died and she was totally unprepared.
That’s “Rosanna’s” story. Rosanna was married for decades to Harry who passed away at age 85. She was 82 at the time. They had three adult daughters and one son, Jackson. Their son was never a steady job holder and had fantasies of how he was going to be a business owner. After his father died, he saw an opportunity. He could easily manipulate his mother, who looked to him to essentially take Harry’s place with decisions about investments. Rosanna had begun to suffer serious memory problems and couldn’t remember a conversation from morning to evening. She was clearly a person with diminished capacity.
Jackson was a co-trustee on the parents’ trust with his mother and sisters, but had sole power to make investment decisions. He conspired with the long time broker-dealer who used to work with his father. The broker also saw an opportunity. The broker told Jackson that he could help him out but Jackson needed to put a lot more of Rosanna’s money into variable annuities. What this meant was that her money would be tied up for years, unless she paid a stiff surrender charge to get to it. A full 87% of Rosanna’s money was then shifted into variable annuities. When Harry died, the amount invested in annuities was about 40%, which was plenty. This shift of most assets into annuities of course generated a huge commission for the broker. About the same time, Jackson took a six-figure loan from Rosanna’s trust without consulting his sisters and without informing them.
They were angry and upset with Jackson for manipulating their mother, for taking out a “loan” from their mother’s trust, which he didn’t pay back and for sneaking around behind their backs putting so much into variable annuities. That was going to affect their inheritance. When the sisters called me, we discussed the issue of manipulation of their mother. No one had ever checked her out for her capacity for financial decisions. When her daughters wanted her to see a doctor to find out more about her memory troubles, Jackson vetoed it. Rosanna consulted Jackson on everything. This meant that legal action was necessary. I referred them to an elder abuse attorney to take up the cause. They were very distressed and not speaking to Jackson. Meanwhile, Jackson again manipulated his mother to get money from her, with which he hired an attorney to harass and threaten the sisters. It was ugly.
No one can be sure how this nasty tale will play out, but the regulators will probably not like the fact that the broker put so much of an 85 year old’s assets into variable annuities. They will probably not like that he had to override his firm’s internal controls set up to prevent that. They will probably not like the fact that the net result is that the estate lost a significant sum compared with what it would have done in conventional investments suitable for an 85 year old. I sent the sisters the forms to file complaints with both FINRA and the SEC. They will also have an attorney to represent them in that matter.
And as for Jackson, I hope that the courts will deal with him justly. He is looking out for himself, that is clear. As a trustee, he had a legal duty to the trust, not to his own self interest in grabbing a six figure “loan” from the trust that he had no means to repay.
The takeaway here is that your aging clients, particularly the very unsophisticated ones like Rosanna are sitting ducks for abuse by unscrupulous brokers. And it is up the the advisors who are ethical to blow the whistle. It is up to everyone to seek justice for the unwary who become victims of manipulation because of greed, the ease of taking advantage of an elder, and the attitude that “it’s not my problem, she’s not my client”. Please make it your business. At AgingInvestor.com, we want to put a stop to this kind of abuse. We urge you to join us!
Click HERE if you want to help us make a difference.
Attention Financial Professionals: Are You A Hero? We want to highlight you!
We are very interested in financial planners, wealth managers, RIAs, CFPs, trust officers and others who have protected elderly clients from abuse or stopped it after they became aware of abuse or predatory practices. Without a fiduciary standard, inappropriate products are being sold to elders by some in the financial field. And that doesn’t even address the outside predators who seek out elderly victims. They’re everywhere.
At AgingInvestor.com we are allies of the elderly, having spent years of our lives serving them, my wife as a nurse and then a litigator and myself as a mental health provider. We will be sponsoring a contest in early April to feature the best of the best in financial services who stopped or prevented elder abuse. My wife and partner Carolyn Rosenblatt blogs at Forbes.com (Aging Parents) and AgingInvestor.com to keep those in this community informed. We want to tell your stories. We hope to educate others in the field and this community by highlighting the actions of courageous people who stepped up to stop scammers, thieves and greedy players inside or outside the financial services field itself. We have a few great candidates already! We know you’re out there. Submit your own name and story or that of someone you respect for their abuse prevention efforts to hero@aginginvestor.com. If you need to remain anonymous for political or personal reasons, we will honor that and not use your real name, location or work place. We want to share your exemplary actions. And if what you did was leave a large organization so you wouldn’t be part of abusive practices there, we think that’s heroic too. Please tell us. We’ll protect your identity totally.
Your stories will inspire others to follow your lead. We’ll feature you in our newsletter with your permission, and let our social media contacts know that you are a standout among the rest. If you want anonymity, we will simply point out the problems that spurred you take the steps you did and that we want to honor the decisions you made. We applaud you.
Thanks for joining us.
Sincerely, Dr. Mikol Davis & Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney
When Laura called me at the urging of her own financial advisor, she was in a crisis. Her father, Jack, age 95 lived in another state and was in a nursing home. She and her sister were worried about a problem: their brother Robbie was taking advantage of their dad and no one was stopping him.
Robbie had been sponging off of Dad for years, Laura told me. She knew Jack probably had dementia, and she had been appointed his Power of Attorney agent, but the transition had not happened yet for her to take over his finances. Robbie had flown out to see Dad from the state where Robbie lived. He took his frail father to Jack’s financial advisor and had his Dad ask the advisor to give Dad a cashier’s check for $50,000. The advisor knew that his client was being manipulated into asking for the money but he gave it to Jack anyway. It was not as if Jack was extremely wealthy. He had limited funds in the account.
Then Jack, with Robbie prodding him, asked his advisor to give him a debit card for his cash management account. The advisor knew full well that Jack’s money could go out the door and into Robbie’s pocket. He decided to deal with the potential abuse by “dragging his feet” for three months. He knew Laura and knew that she was Jack’s agent on his legal documents. He called her describing the call as “on the Q.T”and told Laura that he “had” to comply with the request for the debit card. Laura insisted as the power of attorney that the card should be mailed to her. After she got it, I advised her to destroy it.
The estate attorney who had prepared Jack’s trust knew that Laura should take over her position as Jack’s successor, but he failed to urge her to do so right away. He also failed to give her enough direction about how to accomplish this so she could stop any other actions by Robbie to get Jack’s money. This was one professional failure—the lawyer did not recognize the urgency nor try enough to stop elder abuse.
When I met with Laura, I instructed her exactly how to get the needed doctors’ reports on Dad to meet the requirements Jack’s trust had in it that would permit her to take over responsibility for him. She did so at my urging, right away. I encouraged her to immediately give Dad’s advisor a letter instructing him to cease any transactions initiated by Jack as Jack did indeed have dementia and the doctors had verified that he was no longer capable of managing his affairs. She did that, too. It had also come to light that Robbie had gotten Dad to transfer funds into an account to which Robbie had access and that Robbie had already nearly drained that account of another $30,000.
I sat with Laura and helped her draft a firm letter to Robbie letting him know that the end had come for manipulating Dad and that she was now in charge. He was furious! Ugly emails from Robbie and threats followed. The saga did not end there, but with help, Laura was able to stop any further financial abuse of her father.
The second and most distressing failure of a professional in this true story was the action by Jack’s financial advisor. He did not seem to have any idea of what to do to stop elder abuse that he admitted was going on in dealing with his client
The takeaway here is that every advisor who sees potential elder abuse can and should do much more to protect an elderly client from this kind of manipulation. Every professional has to give up being a slave to the outdated notion that you always have to do what a client says even if the client is seriously impaired. That impaired person is not the client you signed up and you must address this problem.
Learn 5 things every professional should do when you suspect financial abuse by clicking HERE for your free tip sheet.
Imagine you’re at your desk, calling your elderly client for approval of something you’d like to do with his portfolio. The last time you spoke with him, he seemed a little “out of it” but you carried on and did your work. Now, you’re on a call with him again and he’s just not getting anything you’re saying. You repeat patiently. Nothing. You suggest talking to him at a later time.
When you call back two days later, your client has no recollection of the earlier conversation that had you concerned, and worse yet, he still can seem to grasp even the simplest explanation of why you’re calling.
What should you do?
Your client has presented some ominous signs of cognitive impairment, which include inability to track the conversation and memory loss. He has no memory of your call two days earlier. Prompting him by reminding him of when it was and what you said didn’t help.
If you know there is a problem, there is one major reason why you absolutely must do something about it. That is: clients who are developing cognitive impairment are sitting ducks for financial abuse. The abuse could come from a family member, which is an unfortunately common occurrence. It could come from a credit card company who tricks your client into signing up for years of something she doesn’t want or need. It could come from an internet scammer who preys on people exactly like your client, cleverly and with great success. As you may have heard, the latest study on financial elder abuse found that it costs our seniors $36.48 billion a year, rather than the previous estimate of $2.9 billion.
If you believe that confidentiality prevents you from sharing anything about your client with anyone else, take you cue from the Canon of Ethics for lawyers, who have to honor confidentiality as much as anyone can. It says, paraphrasing, that a lawyer may but is not required to take protective action if a client is in danger. In my mind, any ethical lawyer who believes reasonably that her client is in danger from potential financial abuse is going to take protective action. When you see a client too confused to follow your conversation and too impaired to remember a call two days before, that client may be in danger right now. If protective action means calling a designated emergency contact, then you should do it. If it means taking the matter to supervisory or compliance personnel in your organization, then do that as well. If you believe you have no other choice but to get rid of your client and no longer handle his finances or business affairs, then that is also a choice. However, we at AgingInvestor.com think you do have options other than firing your impaired client.
When we look at the law, it builds in protections for those who lose the ability to manage finances for themselves. One of these is a Durable Power of Attorney. Every prudent person who gets estate planning done should have a DPOA as part of the estate planning package. Take your cue from what the law allows any adult to do. That is, everyone should appoint a trusted person to take over when he or she is no longer able to manage finances independently. You client should appoint someone you can call and most importantly give you permission to call or contact that appointed person when your client demonstrates behavior as we described above. The person your client has designated on the DPOA to be her agent may also be the one she give you permission to contact if you believe she is vulnerable to abuse.
Every advisor, business professional and lawyer serving older clients should have permission to contact a third party in the event of emergency or imminent danger. You can get it done with a straightforward document.
If you aren’t sure how to get a waiver of privacy done or whom your client wants to designate, it’s time to act now. Get these things accomplished with the help of experts who can guide you. If you have them in your organization or at your disposal, create your policy without any delay. If you need help, we’re here to offer it at AgingInvestor.com. Contact us for advice, help with drafting your own special privacy waiver, or education about how to bring up the subject of cognitive impairment with your aging clients.
Prior studies put the extent of financial elder abuse at $2.9 billion a year. A recent study finds that the actual amount stolen from elders is $36.48 billion a year. It’s no wonder that some call financial abuse “the crime of the century”. And yet, too many financial professionals see the warning signs and don’t know what to do or think that privacy concerns prevent them from doing anything.
I hope I can change your mind about the privacy issue. It should not stop you from doing the right thing.
According to the report of this recent study by True Link, a financial services company, the design of this survey was guided by recommendations of an expert panel of fraud researchers convened by the Financial Fraud Research Center at the Stanford Center on Longevity. That gives it credibility. No one has yet commented on any flaws in the study and I cannot say if there were any specific shortcomings, but the figure of over $36 billion is indeed startling.
Some of the most surprising study conclusions are that seniors who are younger, urban, and college-educated lose more money than those who are not. That somewhat defies the stereotype in other research suggesting that the isolated, lonely and unsophisticated senior would be the most vulnerable to loss. Another surprising finding is that legal but misleading tactics used to get a senior’s permission to take money from them leads to losses of $16.99 billion per year. The senior may be tricked into giving consent to credit card charges, for example and not realize how deeply or how long that consent ends up costing them.
So it’s not just the unsophisticated investor who gets taken by scammers. It can easily be your well educated client who thinks he knows more than you do and takes very foolish risks because he feels so capable of making decisions. Maybe he is impaired and doesn’t know it.
Or she gets sucked into long term contracts for things she doesn’t want or need. Once she gives approval for a credit card charge, she may be stuck with it. The study shows that people who start out losing a little each year tend to suffer increasing losses over time. A $20 a year loss can turn into a $2000 a year bilking and so on.
One thing every financial professional can do now is to develop a privacy waiver document specific to your organization or your management as an independent advisor that allows you to contact a trusted other whom your client has chosen, in the event that you see some red flags suggesting elder financial abuse.
If you’re unsure about what will give you a legally appropriate form for doing this, we can help you create one at AgingInvestor.com. Education and prevention of elder abuse are our mission. Everyone’s take on privacy may be different, but one thing is clear: you can’t continue to hide behind privacy as an excuse for doing nothing while your very own clients may be victims. Anything from telemarketer scams to undue influence by family to abuse by slick and unscrupulous salesmen of financial products that exploit older investors are everywhere around you.
One thing the study doesn’t explain directly is that it is also up to families to monitor their loved ones. True Link offers a product that allows monitoring of all an individual’s accounts in one place. Great, but what if the aging person won’t let family have access to the account information? That is a major issue. If you, as an advisor want to get involved, you can work with your client early enough that you have a clear policy in place when the time comes that your suspicions of abuse are raised. With a privacy waiver, you have the right to contact family or the person your client appointed to get the ball rolling on stopping abuse.
Caring and honest family need your help as a trusted professional to keep them alerted to any signs of trouble with an elder’s judgment about financial decisions. Some families are scattered all over and they may not have contact with your client about finances. You may not be able single-highhandedly to wipe out every abuse problem, but it seems clear that if you develop a clear policy for reporting danger signs and your suspicions of abuse, you can change the status quo.
You can sharpen your knowledge of an aging client and their financial capacity by completing one of our 6 C.E. courses at AgingInvestor.com. Try the one on understanding the signs of diminished capacity. Sign up today and get an hour of CFB accredited continuing education. Click HERE.
When your aging client has contact with you, consider it an opportunity to educate them about more than the status of their portfolio you manage. Your client’s efforts to maintain financial safety can be thwarted by clever scammers who are constantly devising new ways to take advantage of them. You are in a perfect position to help keep them informed about financial abuse and the latest information on tactics scammers use. Don’t make it someone else’s problem. Make it part of your services.
Take for example the “grandma I need help” scam. My 92 year old mother in law told me about this one. Someone actually had the nerve to try it with her, but she’s smarter than they were and it didn’t work. However, one of her friends did fall into the trap. Somehow the scammers got a list of phone numbers of many of the seniors living in the nicely appointed neighborhood in her retirement community. They get a young man to call from their list of numbers and say “Grandma?” when a woman answers. If she thinks it’s her grandson, she’s bait. The thief then says he’s in trouble, with some made-up some story to get her to worry about him. He then asks her to wire money right away to get him out of this jam. The unsuspecting do it. And get taken.
A newer scam is the gift basket trick. Again, the older person’s phone number and address are known to the thieves. They call the potential victim to be sure he’s home and then tell him they’re Express Courier or any other name and they have a gift delivery. Will he be home in the next hour? If the victim says “yes, I’ll be here” an official looking truck with a courier name on it pulls up within the hour, and the delivery man hands the victim a lovely basket of wine and flowers. The trap is in the delivery man then asking the victim for payment for a “delivery fee’’ because the basket has alcohol and had to be hand delivered to an adult rather than left on the doorstep. Or so they say. The fake courier insists on a credit card payment rather than cash, even if the fee is just $3.50. He uses a small portable credit card scanner and asks for the PIN number for any debit card. What the victim does not know is that the scanner is a device used to steal the credit card information, in the way this kind of information has been stolen from ATMs and gas station credit card machines in the past. The scanner the courier uses even prints out a nice little receipt, making it all the more believable.
The victim doesn’t realize his credit card information has been used to make a dummy credit card with his name on it, which the thieves quickly use until the victim cancels the card. Thousands of dollars can be stolen from the victim’s by ATM cash withdrawals and numerous purchases before the victim knows what is going on. People are getting tricked by this. The scam is working for the scammers and you know they will keep doing it until the public gets well informed enough to decline the offer of the fake gift delivery over the phone.
If you are managing accounts for older clients, take the opportunity to help educate them about these nasty fraudsters who are easily able to get their names and phone numbers. You can make a difference. Tell them in person or make a handout about scams to email or send to them. They may see you as protective of their financial safety in more ways than one. That can uplift your image, always a good thing. We’ll keep you informed about elder abuse and how to protect your aging clients right here at AgingInvestor.com.
When Medicare started, most of us thought it would take care of our medical costs when we got to be 65. Right away, we learned that we have to get supplemental insurance to pay for the 20% of those costs Medicare doesn’t cover. And on top of that, we have to buy a prescription drug plan (Part D). Oh, well. That’s what we do. But here’s the other truth. Even with all that, American seniors are spending an average of another $4000 a year on medical expenses not covered by traditional Medicare.
According to an 11 country study by the Commonwealth Fund published in the journal Health Affairs, American’s are shelling out that amount, which is higher than what any of those in the 10 other countries in the study are spending. For some 19 percent of us, those costs are an obstacle to getting care.
What costs so much? Often, it is treatment for chronic conditions and medications not covered by Medicare, among other things. Medicare doesn’t cover hearing aids, dental care or many kinds of assistive devices, just as a few examples. My mother in law at 92 is paying over $300 a month for one medication she needs right now that is not covered by Medicare. She can handle the expense, but we know a lot of seniors who couldn’t.
According to the survey, 87% of U.S. respondents 65 or oder indicated having one chronic condition and 68 percent had two or more. Those chronic conditions (such as high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes, etc.) need treatment and are managed with medications. Some things aren’t covered by Medicare and that is where the gap lies for seniors. The study concluded among other things that older Americans have difficulty finding high quality care and that we could improve Medicare. I agree.
How does this apply to you and your own aging parents? If your elders are on fixed incomes or do not have an extra $4000 a year to spend on medications and treatment for whatever they’ve got, you could be called upon to help. If you don’t like surprises like being asked when you’re not expecting it, try finding out what your aging parents are spending out of pocket for medical care. Ask them if they have been prescribed any medication in the last year that they didn’t get because they couldn’t afford it. Ask them if any diagnostic test or treatment was recommended that they didn’t get because of the out of pocket cost. If you can help out, offer to do so for aging parents with modest means. They may be too embarrassed to ask for help and simply do without what is prescribed.
The limitations of Medicare are a reality with have to live with, as we do with any government sponsored program. There is no question that it does an enormous amount of good for millions of seniors. Be glad about that and be aware that aging parents could also need some extra assistance from you as they age, need more care and face rising costs. We want them to age with dignity and with as much medical support as they deserve.
If you aren’t sure about what to look for in your older clients who may be developing dementia, you can learn fast at AgingInvestor.com. Just clickhere to sign up for our informative webinar, about what aging clients need and watch it anytime. It’s approved for an hour of CE credit by the CFP Board.
We know that abuse of seniors is a growing problem. Based on information from the National Center on Elder Abuse, the majority of abusers are family members. However, only 44 out of 1000 instances of abuse are reported to authorities. Why aren’t more cases reported to the very authorities capable of stopping the abusers?
It seems to me that most family members are simply unwilling to “rat out” another family member even when they know that abuse is going on. When it comes to the seniors themselves, there is shame and embarrassment associated with being taken advantage of by someone close, especially someone they surely trusted. There is hesitation and fear. They want to talk about it but not do anything about it. The reluctance to report the abuse to Adult Protective Services is not limited to the seniors who can’t bear to call the authorities about a son, daughter or other relative.
I recently received a call from a distressed sister of a brother that she was convinced was stealing from their parents. He had total control over their parents, one of whom had dementia. His parents had appointed him as the agent on both the Durable Power of Attorney and the Advance Healthcare Directive. This gave him the legal authority to make both financial decisions without being accountable to anyone else and all healthcare decisions as well. I listened patiently to all the reasons she thought her brother was taking her parents’ money and using it for himself. I asked her if she had called Adult Protective Services.” No”, she said. When I asked why not she said “I don’t want to get my brother in trouble”. Where is the logic in that?
In another case, the elder herself had called. “I gave my grandson a big loan and he hasn’t paid it back,” she said. “But now I need the money to live on”. She described how her favorite grandson had taken title to her mobile home and gotten a loan, even after she had “loaned” him most of her savings. I explained that her chances of getting paid back were probably not very good, but the least she could do was to report what had happened to authorities. I advised her that taking a “loan” from an 80 year old and not paying it back would likely be considered elder abuse and it should be reported to APS. “Would my grandson go to jail?” she asked. I told her I didn’t know but it can happen when someone has committed this crime of elder abuse. She said, “I don’t want my grandson to go to jail”. Unfortunately, I am sure she did not follow up or do anything more about the problem.
Seniors like the 80-year-old woman are typical of why elder abuse does not get reported and therefore prosecuted more often, even when a family member is well aware of what is going on and knows that it is wrong. They would rather suffer impoverishment than be the one to report abuse. In fact, these same victims may refuse to testify against a relative who has abused them, even when these cases are prosecuted. Charges may not stick when the victim is unwilling to testify, unless there are independent records to prove the case in court.
It is as much a problem of our emotions and fears as it is of the wrongdoing itself. We somehow justify the actions, we look the other way or we fear what justice will do to our abusive relative.
I wonder, where is the anger at a crime against a person who is easily taken advantage of by the abuser? Where is the advocacy for the vulnerable person who is also our relative? Why are we remaining silent in this growing, $2.9 billion dollar a year problem?
I would be willing to guess that there is someone reading this whose client has a financial abuser in a their family or knows of a family where this has taken place. I urge you to speak up. To my knowledge, you can remain anonymous in your reporting, just as you can with any crime. Whether or not the criminal justice system can prove the crime is not your problem. It is your problem to carry the knowledge of financial abuse with you and to do nothing to protect the elder. One day it could be you who is victimized.
We are all encountering an aging population and the crime of opportunity of abusing elders is not going away. I am hopeful that we will show enough concern, enough responsibility and enough guts to do the right thing when we see a wrong that needs our attention.
Services from AgingInvestor.com are provided personally by Carolyn L. Rosenblatt and Dr. Mikol S. Davis jointly or individually by agreement.
We offer:
Webinars, customized or pre-recorded for you/your organization. Q & A included with live webinars (Pre-recorded, CFP Board accredited CE webinars now available on our website at your convenience).
Instructor led training workshops (ILT)- customized for your specific issues
Web-based instruction, constructed and designed with your preferred content. Interactive or non-interactive custom designs available. Work with us to develop your instructional design at your discretion or use our contracted designer for excellent results.
Policy Development Kits: get senior-specific policies in place with your “Policy in a Box” guidance. Step-by-step instruction, general parameters of a good policy, sample documents, and much more will help you get up and running. Best use is when combined with a consultation to help you implement what you develop for yourself or your organization.
Financial advisors can protect their clients from financial ruin – and their financial firms from legal and compliance risk
Four critical things a smart and ethical financial advisor can do to make the client’s transition of power more likely to succeed
By Marie Swift for Guidevine.com
—
It’s a fact of life. None of us are getting any younger. Life marches on and cognitive disabilities can set in. Financial advisors can spot dementia if properly trained. In addition, they can stop their older clients from harming themselves financially – and from claiming the advisor (or others close them in their personal life) had something to do with their undoing.
The legal and compliance risks to an advisor’s practice are very real. Forward-thinking advisors will ramp up their skills now.
Here are some tips from Carolyn L. Rosenblatt and Dr. Mikol Davis who together develop educational materials for financial advisors and speak at financial services industry conferences in a attempt to reduce elder abuse, and to also reduce legal / compliance risks for financial advisory firms and allied institutions. Rosenblatt is an RN, an attorney and a consultant on aging issues. Dr. Davis is a licensed, clinical psychologist with thirty-seven years of experience in the mental health field. More information about their work can be found at AgingInvestor.com and AgingParents.com.
WHAT TO DO IN THE EVENT OF THE CLIENT’S COGNITIVE DECLINE
Financial advisors may notice the warning signs ofcognitive decline in a client for some time. When they conclude that their aging client is getting to the point when he or she is unable to safely manage financial decisions any longer, the time will come when someone must take over for the client. Typically a responsible client has an estate plan and someone is appointed as the client’s successor.
One important step for the advisor is to find out if the client has indeed created an estate plan with a provision for a successor. It may be a successor trustee for a family trust or it may be an agent on a Durable Power of Attorney. Sometimes, for many reasons, even otherwise responsible people just don’t get their estate planning done. If the client has not accomplished the estate planing needed, this is a step the advisor can take that will protect both the client and the advisory firm. The advisor, with the help of their legal and compliance department can develop an institution-specific document that allows the client to appoint the appropriate successor to take his or her place for management decisions over the funds the advisor controls and to waive his or her right to privacy with that appointed agent. This is essential. The advisor can’t do the job of protecting the client without it.
Once the advisor is informed about the agent the client has appointed to take the reins in the event of his or her incapacity, the advisor needs to take the initiative for the next steps.
FOUR CRITICAL THINGS TO DO WHEN A TRANSITION OF POWER IS NEAR
Here are four critical things a smart and ethical financial advisor can do to make the transition more likely to succeed:
Recognize and acknowledge that this transition of power is difficult for anyone.
“If the client, whom you may have known over decades, has been a powerful person in his or her life, and has been “the boss” in one way or another, giving up the status and position of being in charge will never be easy. Let the client know that you understand this,” said Rosenblatt.
“Communicate that your effort is to protect his hard work and the prudent decisions he has made over the time you have known him,” said Dr. Davis. “This acknowledgement lets him know that you respect that this is emotionally trying for him. The trust he has in you will help you both.”
Set up a face-to-face meeting, if possible, with your client and his or her successor.
“The time should be chosen carefully,” warns Dr. Davis. “Be sure that there are no immediately stressful life events going on with your client that might distract from the importance of the meeting. An illness, loss of a spouse or family member, a divorce or other traumatic incident will absorb your client’s attention and could interfere with your effort to succeed.”
“Find out how your client is doing in general, and select the right time accordingly,” underscores Rosenblatt.
Choose the place for a meeting carefully.
“Your aging client is already dealing with loss of control, probably in more ways than financially,” Rosenblatt continued. “If you have observed obvious changes in your client over time, there are likely other parts of his life that are a problem too.”
“Let him choose where to meet. Do what you can to ensure that he is comfortable and that there is privacy. Encourage him to tell you about his concerns and fears in arranging the meeting. Be an excellent listener,” advises Dr. Davis.
Expect resistance and do advance planning on how to manage it.
“No one wants to think of herself as being too old to do what she has always done,” Rosenblatt said.
“No one will relish the idea of a difficult meeting in which she must acknowledge that she has to yield control over finances,” echoes Dr. Davis. “Vulnerability is the result.”
“If your client pushes back at the suggestion of a meeting, let her know that you understand why she might not want to have it but that it is going to be necessary, and soon. Set a date for follow up. Don’t push too hard, but gently persist,” Rosenblatt emphasized.
IN CONCLUSION
Aging clients will very likely need someone to assist with financial management eventually. This is something to plan for as an expected development, rather than a “maybe” or unlikely possibility. Financial advisors who are prepared for how to handle the potential transition of control can help to ensure their clients are protected from dangerous money decisions that arise from cognitive impairment. Astute financial advisors will be prepared to manage any transition as gracefully as possible.
As a financial professional, you may not be aware of what is going on in your elderly clients’ daily lives, but families sometimes find out about scammers who have victimized their loved ones. You could come across them too. An adult child of your client may mention a situation that is alarming or your clients may tell you themselves about this “great product” they’ve gotten. If it sounds odd, start asking questions.
Here’s an example:
According to the Waterloo Cedar Falls Courier, an adult daughter discovered that her aging parents were spending thousands of dollars on supplements to fix a wide range of health problems. The scammers were from Las Vegas based Leading Health Source, and they had taken advantage of the elderly couple’s vulnerability to their sales pitch. It might not have been so bad if they had simply sold the couple a reasonable amount of nutritional supplements. But over a period of 20 months Leading Health Source had ripped off the elders for more than $44,000, a sum they couldn’t afford.
This is the piece to which we, at AgingInvestors.com want you to pay the most attention. In this instance, the daughter took action. She went to bat for her aging parents, rather than doing nothing or considering it her parents’ problem.
Leading Edge was investigated after the daughter reported the large sum her parents had paid to them. The daughter had attended an event held by Iowa Fraud Fighters at Kirkwood Community College. Presumably, she learned there that she should file a complaint with the state Attorney General and she did so.
The outcome in this case was very good for the elders. The matter was settled, and the Attorney General’s office demanded that Leading Edge pay back everything the couple had paid to them. That meant getting a check from Leading Edge for more than $23,000 to start and having the remainder of the credit card charges reversed.
The Courier, source of this story reported that the Attorney General’s investigators found Leading Edge well aware that the people they were selling to in this case were easily manipulated. Their telemarketers’ handwritten notes indicated that the elderly woman involved had “memory” issues and that her husband had dementia.
What can you, the professional, just managing money or offering products to your aging clients learn from this?
First, note that memory issues and dementia in an aging couple is a setup for fraud and abuse. If you think your own client may have these issues, even a little, beware. You could be prosecuted if you proceed with transactions. If law enforcement is contacted or FINRA is involved, you will be scrutinized. It could be, in the above example that Leading Edge owners and principals didn’t know what their unscrupulous telemarketers were doing. Perhaps the telemarketers were motivated by a commission or other sales incentive and an easy opportunity presented itself with an easy sale. But the principals were held liable nonetheless. They either failed to supervise adequately or they looked the other way. They are consequently barred from doing business in Iowa.
The second thing to learn is that family of your client may be a very helpful asset to the ethical financial services professional trying to preserve capital for a client. Understand your client’s family relationships and whom to trust. When even a whiff of possible abuse happens, you can report it to the authorities. You don’t have to be right if you suspect something. You just have to be reasonable in what you think is reportable problem. It’s better to report it with the facts you do know and have it turn out to be a false alarm than to take the chance of not doing anything and have your client suffer the effect of theft and fraud.
Financial advisors can spot and do something to prevent financial elder abuse. Advisors are in a unique position to observe their clients over years, sometimes decades. Knowing a client well gives them the vantage point to understand their clients’ normal general life situations as well as their patterns of using their accounts, which can make them well positioned to spot red flags and any unusual activity.
As part of the national legal community dedicating time to the protection of vulnerable elders I see communications from lawyers all over the U.S. with complaints that Adult Protective Services are not taking financial elder abuse seriously enough in many places. When it is reported, APS may dismiss it as “a civil matter” in which they have no interest. APS is essentially an investigative help to the criminal justice system. It can intervene when an elder is in physical danger. Social workers and investigators from APS look into reports of abuse and help the DA determine whether there is evidence sufficient to prosecute a crime. If the matter involves the undue influence of a family member and the elder seems willing to give away money, even if duped into doing so, APS is unlikely to take any action.
Financial advisors cannot rely on the their local community’s APS to protect their clients when abuse is suspected. Particularly in the case of family, close associates, and caregivers, APS may not wish to interfere unless or until an obvious crime has been committed. Many of these abusive situations are not so obvious, or the elder appears to be willing to give away his assets, and he may not see that anything is wrong. it is up to others to work to stop the abuse, including financial advisors, who may be in a highly trusted position with the elder.
The financial services industry, generally, has avoided certain kinds of communication with family of aging investors due to privacy laws, concerns which they interpret as precluding them from sharing financial information. I do not agree that privacy should stop advisors from communication with family when an elder clearly needs protective action. There is a way around the privacy question. Policy can be created to obtain permission from every client to communicate with a family member or trusted other appointed to step in when the advisor (and compliance) have reasonably concluded that the elder is being taken advantage of financially or otherwise.
If you see something, say something is what we are supposed to do to stop terrorist attacks. It is also what we need to do to stop elder financial abuse. The financial industry needs to develop new, forward looking, senior specific policies to address the rampant problem of elder abuse.
Here at Aging Investor, we are doing our part to help by developing educational materials for industry professionals. We want every professional to recognize the red flags warnings of potential abuse, to understand diminished financial capacity and to how to get the necessary document in place around the issue of privacy. Aging expertise from outside the financial services field is needed for all of these points. I hope all advisors, their compliance departments and organizational heads will pursue what FINRA has urged on you since 2008: that senior-specific policies be put in place to stem the rising tide of elder financial abuse of their own aging clients. We offer resources such as our CE courses and have written a book to help you better understand and manage your aging clients.
Until next time, Carolyn Rosenblatt AgingInvestor.com
Doesn’t every financial advisor want to stand out from the crowd? Be better at delivering services? Somehow get a reputation as a cut above the average guy or gal in the biz?
If you are seeking to distinguish yourself, you can. The secret is not in getting better returns, finding unique ways to protect assets or getting it right with your investment strategies. It’s in offering a different service from the other guys in addition to doing all the money management, usual things well.
The different service we’re talking about is looking at your older client’s age, making a plan to look at all the aspects of their lives that are likely to change as they age and being an educator and advisor to help them plan for those things. This is not limited to figuring out how much your client will need in retirement. It goes way past that, and the issue of housing. Yes, your role as advisor will go beyond financial matters into the personal and the so called “soft skills’!
Does this make you uncomfortable? “I just manage money” you may be thinking. But the financial picture is connected to the person, who is usually connected to a family. The finances are not in a vacuum with no relation to an investor who is aging, and her needs as she gets older and may lose her ability to make sound financial decisions. This is not about merely preserving assets and making the money last. People are of course affected by the aging process, which brings with it risks. One of those risks is dementia and loss of financial capacity for accepting your advice. What then?
“I’ll worry about that when my client gets old” you say? The problem with that thinking is that you don’t know when your client is “getting old”. Dementia is a sneaky brain disease that usually develops over years. The signs are subtle. And dangerous. The risk of Alzheimer’s Disease, the most common kind of dementia doubles every 5 years after age 65. 5.2 million people already have it. Lots more are expected to develop it as Boomers age. One day, as you avoid conversations about possible loss of financial capacity, you may find that it is too late to get your client to sign anything, agree to anything, or worse yet, that he is a victim of financial abuse.
If you truly want to stand out as an advisor, not just for being a great producer, but for offering cutting edge service, get the training you need to make that service include skill in addressing and anticipating possible loss of capacity in your clients. Get the right document in place to protect your client and protect yourself from regulatory questions about privacy.
If you are considering this suggestions seriously, visit us at AgingInvestor.com and sign up for one of our online courses. We’ve got the aging expertise you may not have yourself and you can get a lot smarter about aging clients as you get some training.
Meanwhile, think about becoming a unique service provider who is branching into an area no one can avoid: our populations is living longer than ever. You are in a great position to be a forward thinker about aging issues with your clients as a part of your work. You can take pride in it.
There is a buzz going on about the problems financial professionals are having with clients who are aging and losing capacity for financial decisions. It directly affected Kathleen Pritchard, head of business development at Legg Mason.
Her father-in-law was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease at 73 and she and her husband approached the father’s financial advisor for help. He had been managing an estate worth over 8 million dollars. He said,
“I basically don’t do any of that. I just manage your dad’s money.” (more…)
As just about everyone was outraged and offended by Donald Sterling’s racist comments, you might wonder how there could be anything to learn from what he said and did in the time that has passed since his story first broke.
To some people, Donald Sterling seemed rational. A horrible racist, but being that way in control of his faculties and choosing to do what he did. Was there something wrong with him or was he just being his racist and unreasonable self? I think his conduct is a good example of how a cognitively impaired person can seem logical and in control one minute and totally out of control the next. And he is an example of how an impaired person can destroy his chances, make bad decisions and have a massive loss. You just might find yourself with a client like that.
Here’s what I mean. Donald Sterling’s comments led to his wife insisting that he be examined by two doctors, psychologists. Both concluded that he had Alzheimer’s Disease. When you saw Sterling on TV, you might have thought, “well, he seems weird, but he apparently knows what he’s doing”. Did he?
A person with Alzheimer’s lacks judgment about finances. That issue was at the very heart of the case when he agreed to sell the L.A. Clippers, and then changed his mind and tried to block the sale in a court battle with his wife. Some might be skeptical about the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s. After all, two billion dollars was at stake and fights over anything that big can bring up just about anything.
But notice this: if you want to win in court, you are going to put on your best behavior. If a judge is looking at you to make a decision about whether you are financially competent or not, you’re not going to do anything that would lead the judge, holding enormous power with his decision, to rule against you. That’s what a reasonable person with ordinary good judgment would do. Even if you’re mad as hell, you’re not going to lose it and prove to the judge just how out of control you are. But lose it is exactly what Sterling did with his chance in court.
Imagine that someone with that much money would hire the most highly skilled lawyers possible. Imagine that they were ready with all possible evidence to refute the allegations of Sterling’s wife that Donald was not competent. And what did he do? He behaved erratically over several days of testimony. He raised his voice at his own lawyers and those opposing him. He called his wife a “pig” in court. In other words, he could not exercise enough good judgment to do what any reasonable person would do in his circumstance. H could not rein in his impulses. He blew it.
Of course, the judge ruled against him. He was found to be incompetent to make a decision to stop the sale of the Clippers and his wife won out.
The lesson here is that people who have dementia, the major symptom of Alzheimer’s Disease, lose their judgment about finances. They may make bad decisions against your advice. They may behave erratically. They may act out one minute and be apparently fine the next. When you have a client who has a history and a pattern of making certain kinds of choices about how to invest his money, and he begins to divert from that, you know it is a red flag that something may be wrong. You know that he could lose his wealth if this keeps up. What are you supposed to do?
Other than escalating the problem to compliance sooner or later, you may not think there are any choices. But we at AgingInvestor.com believe there are choices about how you are going to approach and deal with these problematic clients, whether they are as extreme as Donald Sterling or not. There are options for anticipating the realistic possibility that your clients who are aging are going to become cognitively impaired. You can create innovative policies to manage them in a proactive way, involving family, involving significant others, and complying with privacy considerations. You don’t have to fire the client and lose the assets under management. If you have a clear path that enables you to take protective action and engage a third party whom the client has identified and appointed far in advance, you may be able to work with the appointed person and continue to carry out the wishes and philosophy of your client even if he becomes impaired. We are here to help you craft those policies and we empower you to implement them.
This process can change and disrupt the old, outmoded ways of dealing with our aging investors. It’s radical. It’s different. We think it should be done. If you would like to explore this for yourself or your organization, contact us today at AgingInvestor.com for a preview. We will help you become a change agent and an innovator.
Alice, my mother in law, is blessed with a great memory and pretty good health for a woman of her age. She works at it. She’s been a widow for 6 years now. Dad always handled their finances. Since she’s been on her own, she relies on her two adult children and an accountant friend to guide her about her investments. She was referred to a financial advisor known by a family member. She thought things were fine until a year went by, the market was doing well and she had no gains at all in her portfolio. She’s comfortable, but not wealthy by most measures. There is enough to take care of her, though full time care would eat up a lot of what she has. Luckily at this time, she is able to remain independent.
When She Discovered The Truth
Alice decided to change financial advisors. It was then that she learned, to her dismay, that her other advisor had done something that really got her angry. He had taken 10% of her investable assets and put them into a real estate investment trust (REIT) that could not be liquidated without a substantial financial penalty to her. She is not savvy about complex investments and relies on others for advice. She relied on her advisor a lot. She is clear that she needs to watch out for herself. She says the advisor never told her what he was doing with this investment and never explained that she would not be able to access the funds if she needed them unless she suffered a loss, in the form of a penalty. He, of course says he told her all about it and she agreed. She doesn’t believe him. My husband, Mikol, interviewed her about this and put it on YouTube. Here’s what Alice has to say. http://tinyurl.com/pmqf3j2
In the July 14, 2013 InvestmentNews, Dan Jamieson reported that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the state regulator in MA are cracking down on exactly the kind of nontraditional, illiquid investment the financial advisor chose for Alice. Mr. Jamieson reports that In February, Massachusetts settled a case against LPL, which agreed to pay at least $2 million in restitution and $500,000 in fines related to the sale of nontraded REITs.
State regulators in Massachusetts settled their cases against five high profile firms who agreed to pay a total of $6.1 million in restitution to investors, and fines totaling $975,000.
FINRA CRACKDOWN
State regulators aren’t the only ones cracking down on alternatives.
FINRA also warned members in 2012 in its annual exam priorities letter that it was “particularly concerned about sales practice abuses [and] yield-chasing behaviors” that might lead investors into unsuitable complex products.
Products under scrutiny by FINRA in 2013 included business development companies, structured products, nontraded REITs and private placements.
“Finra grinds us on structured notes and commodity-linked notes,” said the president of a broker-dealer organization, who asked not to be identified.
The regulators are reported to have found out that in the REIT cases, people didn’t know what they were investing in. We think that is true for Alice. We also think her advisor, knowing her lack of sophistication, took advantage of her for the sake of his commission. His justification is that “she didn’t need the money” and that “she was investing for the benefit of her heirs”. Her family, particularly her son, thinks that is rather arrogant of him. How does he know whether she’ll live to be 100 and whether she will need the money? Furthermore, Alice is not investing “for the benefit of her heirs” when she is relying on her funds to take care of her own needs for the rest of her life.
What We Did
As soon as we found out about the REIT sold to Alice, then 90, and how illiquid it was and for how long, we confronted the advisor with a letter and sent him a copy of the Investment News article. He called shortly afterwards. He tried to justify his actions, but was told very politely by my husband that Alice was to get full restitution or a FINRA complaint would be promptly filed.
Permission of various kinds had to be obtained. The advisor had left his firm and gone with a large bank. This messed things up for him for a time, but I thought he deserved it. This was the threat of a claim. Two lawyers called and argued how great the investment was. We held our own and continued to insist on full restitution for Alice. More excuses. Months of lawyering and letters later, she got full restitution. You’ve never seen more butt-covering letters from them.
The lesson here is to be smarter than this guy was. It’s not that the investment itself was bad. It paid a decent return. It’s that at her age it was clearly unsuitable. So keep the age of your client in mind and don’t make dumb assumptions like, “she didn’t need the money”. That is a foolish statement for anyone to make about a 90 year old with a relatively modest portfolio who could need hundreds of thousands of dollars of care as some seniors do before the ends of their lives.
If you need private advice about any aging client whose behavior makes you question the client’s financial capacity for decisions, call us. We have the expertise to help you assess the client’s abillity and we can guide you.
Don’t wait for FINRA to come knocking.
Until next time,
Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney, Mediator AgingInvestor.com
So, when you get this properly written, be sure that you have garnered about proofreading and editing services 10 points.
Anyone who has spent time around older adults, whether they be family members, friends or your clients, probably knows someone who seems “with it” sometimes and “not with it” at other times. They can change from making sense to not making sense in a matter of minutes or hours. Do you think of this person as competent? Do you overlook all the little “slips” and signs of their not being able to track the conversation? Do you treat the person as if everything were fine and normal? Here at AgingInvestor.com, we refer to the in-between state of mind as the grey zone. It describes a person in a way that is neither black nor white, neither completely without decision-making ability nor completely safe in decision making. It is a variable problem and one nearly all of us are going to witness sooner or later. Why?
A Red Flag For Financial Advisors With Aging Clients
Hello there. I’m Carolyn Rosenblatt, RN, Attorney and family mediator for those with aging loved ones. My passion is working with older adults and their families, as well as those who serve them.
AgingInvestor.com is dedicated to helping those in the financial services industry learn more about aging from those of us with expertise in aging. Our purpose is to help you better serve your clients, keep your business as they age and serve them more competently as their aging begins to create issues for you.
Most of us, in general, do not have any specific knowledge about aging itself, much less how it can affect the brain and decision making ability. We base what we know on our family experience or what we have learned from friends. That’s fine, but it can really limit our perspective.
The fields of gerontology, medicine, healthcare, and other related disciplines have produced a great deal of research that can be helpful to all of us in a society where longevity is increasing so significantly. We are indeed in a changing environment when it comes to aging. Many of us are going to encounter or are already encountering issues with which we have no experience but which we have to face. Our parents, grandparents and our clients are living longer and having more problems related to aging. We may be unprepared. (more…)
The client who called us was in great distress. Her name is changed to protect her identity.
Deanne had just been in contact with her mother’s financial advisor. Score one for the advisor for remembering that his client had a family and for having enough information to even contact the daughter. BUT, what the advisor told the daughter was very distressing.
“Your mother is going to run out of money in about 24 months”, he said. Deanne’s heart almost stopped! She is 52 years old and has had enough trouble supporting herself, much less worrying about her mother. She felt sick and panicked. What was she going to do?
Deanne’s mother is 84. She is in generally good health and may be around for quite a while. What might the advisor have done in this case?
Most financial services professionals work very hard to grow a client’s assets and to protect them against running out of money. But let’s face it: many factors are in play and when you start with a modest amount, there might not be a way to make it last to the end of a person’s life. How much notice do you have? Should you warn the family of a potential coming disaster? (more…)
We are very interested in financial planners, wealth managers, RIAs, CFPs, trust officers and others who have protected elderly clients from abuse or stopped it after they became aware of abuse or predatory practices. Without a fiduciary standard, inappropriate products are being sold to elders by some in the financial field. And that doesn’t even address the outside predators who seek out elderly victims. They’re everywhere. 
